The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment building to its manager One month ago all the showerheads on the first five floors of Sunnyside Towers were modified to restrict the water flow to approximately one third

Essay topics:

The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment building to its manager.
"One month ago, all the showerheads on the first five floors of Sunnyside Towers were modified to restrict the water flow to approximately one-third of its original flow. Although actual readings of water usage before and after the adjustment are not yet available, the change will obviously result in a considerable savings for Sunnyside Corporation, since the corporation must pay for water each month. Except for a few complaints about low water pressure, no problems with showers have been reported since the adjustment. Clearly, restricting water flow throughout all the twenty floors of Sunnyside Towers will increase our profits further."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.

In given the author's letter, the author recommends that restricting water flow through out all the floors of the apartment will increase the company's profits. although the author's assumption seems plausible considering that there was no problem reported with water flow adjustment on the first five floors, and the corporation is monthly pay for water now, numerous assumptions have to be delved into in order to assess the recommendation adequately.

The author's recommendation critically leans on poor analogy between water adjustment on the first five floors and the remaining fifteen floors. although water flow modification was successful on the first five floors, it does not guarantee tha the same measure leads to the same degree of success on the other floors. intensity of water flow might differ in change of floors. if the higher floors have less strong intensity of water flow, such decrease in water flow might cause a lot of complaints, and the adjustment could fail. further evidence pertaining to whether the first five floors and the other floors are completely comparable is necessary for an adequate assessment.

The author's assertion assumes that few number of complaints is not a serious problem. However, despite small number of complaint, it might cause decrease in the profit of the corporation. if residences who raise the complaints and move to another apartment due to seriously weak water flow, it might bring out decrease in the profit. Moreover, people might be reluctant to live in an apartment with weak water flow, and it is critically harmful to the company's profit. further evidence about the intensity of water flow and seriousness of the complaints is vital to make evaluation accurate.

In sum, the author's argument may or may not lead to increase in profit. evidence for or against the critical assumptions such as difference between the first five floors and the other floors and seriousness of the complaints , is needed to enable adequate assessment.

Votes
Average: 6 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-19 abjodas 63 view
2022-09-05 anujmore 68 view
2022-06-01 Ak_vido 69 view
2021-09-07 samuelgreprep 60 view
2021-08-06 saanri54321 58 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In given the authors letter, the author ...
^^
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
... recommends that restricting water flow through out all the floors of the apartment will in...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...ent will increase the companys profits. although the authors assumption seems plausible ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ease the companys profits. although the authors assumption seems plausible considering ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sess the recommendation adequately. The authors recommendation critically le...
^^
Line 3, column 7, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...he recommendation adequately. The authors recommendation critically leans on poor...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...loors and the remaining fifteen floors. although water flow modification was successful ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Intensity
... degree of success on the other floors. intensity of water flow might differ in change of...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
... flow might differ in change of floors. if the higher floors have less strong inte...
^^
Line 3, column 534, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Further
...plaints, and the adjustment could fail. further evidence pertaining to whether the firs...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 534, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: further,
...plaints, and the adjustment could fail. further evidence pertaining to whether the firs...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecessary for an adequate assessment. The authors assertion assumes that few n...
^^
Line 5, column 7, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ry for an adequate assessment. The authors assertion assumes that few number of co...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'few numbers'.
Suggestion: few numbers
... The authors assertion assumes that few number of complaints is not a serious problem....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...rease in the profit of the corporation. if residences who raise the complaints and...
^^
Line 5, column 472, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Further
...tically harmful to the companys profit. further evidence about the intensity of water f...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 472, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: further,
...tically harmful to the companys profit. further evidence about the intensity of water f...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... vital to make evaluation accurate. In sum, the authors argument may or may ...
^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... evaluation accurate. In sum, the authors argument may or may not lead to increa...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 54, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... authors argument may or may not lead to increase in profit. evidence for or agai...
^^
Line 7, column 76, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Evidence
...or may not lead to increase in profit. evidence for or against the critical assumptions...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 228, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...floors and seriousness of the complaints , is needed to enable adequate assessment...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.6327345309 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 13.6137724551 29% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 28.8173652695 24% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 55.5748502994 88% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 16.3942115768 128% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 2260.96107784 74% => OK
No of words: 321.0 441.139720559 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23676012461 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80980395472 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 204.123752495 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467289719626 0.468620217663 100% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 705.55239521 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0158505265 57.8364921388 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.071428571 119.503703932 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 23.324526521 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.70786347227 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 22.0 5.25449101796 419% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173868046528 0.218282227539 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681997570545 0.0743258471296 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430282194502 0.0701772020484 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111837831912 0.128457276422 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442400735843 0.0628817314937 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.3799401198 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.3550499002 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.5979740519 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.32208582834 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 98.500998004 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 15
No. of Words: 321 350
No. of Characters: 1649 1500
No. of Different Words: 144 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.233 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.137 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.767 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 123 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 93 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 72 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 49 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 45.857 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 21.957 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.857 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.518 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.774 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.187 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5