The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of marketing at Dura-Socks, Inc.
The author of this recommendation claims that the factory should discontinue use of the Endure manufacturing process for making more profits. To justify this recommendation, the author cites the following facts. Based upon a survey which indicates that customers tend to purchase the sock every three months. In addition, the primary future of socks for most of the respondents is colorful. Scrutiny each of these facts, however, reveal hat none of them lend credible supports to the recommendation.
First, the author provides no provide assurance that the survey on which the argument depends is statistically reliable. We need to know about the number of respondents, their age, or even their cities. Indeed, if most people who took part in the survey were in a certain small area, so the author can not generalize the survey’s result to nationwide. Moreover, if the number of respondents was too low to ensure that all people purchase socks every three months or durability is not important for them.
Second, base on the fact that respondents buy the sock every three months, the author infers that customers do not need durable socks. However, it is entirely possible that customers like to buy new socks, while they still use their old socks. In addition, they may use different color socks in the diversity of situations, so they need to have many socks in the home. Without considering this possible scenario, the author cannot justifiably conclude that customers do not need the durable stocks.
In third place, the soundness of the conclusion that discontinuing use of the Endure manufacturing process yields the increased profits of the company should be answered by the author. Although, common sense informs me that company can decrease the cost of production process by this suggestion,
In fact, the company decreases the cost of the production process by this suggestion, while the factory can lose a part of customers as well as its profits, which are can be significant. Since, the author relies on the limited information and ignores many effective factors on profits, I can not take the author final conclusion seriously.
In sum up, the argument is logically flawed and therefore unconvincing as it stands. To strengthen the argument, the author must provide clear evidence that the survey’s respondents reflect the general population. In addition, we need to know about all possible factors that customers consider for purchasing socks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | aymenhamrouni | 35 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | Dhruv_gre | 63 | view |
| 2019-05-24 | saeidroky | 38 | view |
| 2017-07-27 | roncy | 10 | view |
| 2017-07-26 | sksh_anwar | 33 | view |
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the complaint 70
- "Ten years ago, as part of a comprehensive urban renewal program, the city of Transopolis adapted for industrial use a large area of severely substandard housing near the freeway. Subsequently, several factories were constructed there, crime rates in the 66
- Claim: The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.Reason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea. 58
- Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another. 41
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All students should be required to study art and music in secondary school Use specific reasons to support your answer 97
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...t the factory should discontinue use of the Endure manufacturing process for making more p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 75, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...he conclusion that discontinuing use of the Endure manufacturing process yields the increa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f production process by this suggestion, In fact, the company decreases the cost ...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'therefore', 'third', 'well', 'while', 'as to', 'in addition', 'in fact', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.257709251101 0.25644967241 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.13436123348 0.15541462614 86% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0748898678414 0.0836205057962 90% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0462555066079 0.0520304965353 89% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0330396475771 0.0272364105082 121% => OK
Prepositions: 0.140969162996 0.125424944231 112% => OK
Participles: 0.0154185022026 0.0416121511921 37% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.89172403197 2.79052419416 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0220264317181 0.026700313972 82% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.129955947137 0.113004496875 115% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0220264317181 0.0255425247493 86% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00881057268722 0.0127820249294 69% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2485.0 2731.13054187 91% => OK
No of words: 398.0 446.07635468 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.24371859296 6.12365571057 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.57801047555 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.399497487437 0.378187486979 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.293969849246 0.287650121315 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.208542713568 0.208842608468 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.153266331658 0.135150697306 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89172403197 2.79052419416 104% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 207.018472906 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505025125628 0.469332199767 108% => OK
Word variations: 55.3989048722 52.1807786196 106% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.039408867 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.9473684211 23.2022227129 90% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4669088306 57.7814097925 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.789473684 141.986410481 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9473684211 23.2022227129 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.894736842105 0.724660767414 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.14285714286 117% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.58251231527 84% => OK
Readability: 50.3443533457 51.9672348444 97% => OK
Elegance: 1.9381443299 1.8405768891 105% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363141289066 0.441005458295 82% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.123393023936 0.135418324435 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0923343365448 0.0829849096947 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.599896530249 0.58762219726 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.119635398713 0.147661913831 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170315070554 0.193483328276 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775951916701 0.0970749176394 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.422931164736 0.42659136922 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0943766158534 0.0774707102158 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263257378797 0.312017818177 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327772490118 0.0698173142475 47% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.33743842365 120% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.87684729064 44% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.82512315271 124% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 6.46551724138 155% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 5.36822660099 56% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.82389162562 142% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 14.657635468 116% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.