The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of marketing at DuraSocks, Inc.
"A recent study of Dura-Socks customers suggests that our company is wasting the money it spends on its patented Endure manufacturing process, which ensures that our socks are strong enough to last for two years. We have always advertised our use of the Endure process, but the new study shows that despite the socks' durability, our customers, on average, actually purchase new Dura-Socks every three months. Furthermore, customers surveyed in our largest market — northeastern United States cities — say that they most value Dura-Socks' stylish appearance and availability in many colors. These findings suggest that we can increase our profits by discontinuing use of the Endure manufacturing process."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
The argument reaches the conclusion that DuraSocks must discontinue their use of the Endure manufacturing process to increase their profits. This conclusion is based on the apparent results of a recently conducted study, citing that customers like the socks’ style, but purchase them every three months, on average. In reaching this conclusion, the author of the argument fails to answer three important questions, the answers to which could dramatically change the validity of the argument.
First, is the survey truly representative of the customers of DuraSocks? It may be possible that the study was only conducted in the United States, ignoring other consumer bases, perhaps, Canada or the United Kingdom. By ignoring these other countries, the study may be biased primarily towards the US, and it is possible that people tend to buy socks more often in the US than in other countries, due to climatic conditions like extremely cold weather. Socks may be worn for almost the entire day by people in the US, but used sparingly in hotter countries like Mexico. This would lead to American respondents potentially wearing off the socks faster, needing to buy them more often. It is also likely that only a few batches of the socks manufactured were not durable; this however does not provide a valid argument against the Endure process as a whole. There may be overrepresentation of customers who use socks for longer durations than average. If the study is shown to be representative of the consumer base, and the answer to this question is ‘yes,’ only then would the author’s trust in the survey be valid.
Second, even if we assume that the survey is representative, does the increased purchasing frequency of socks indicate that they are not as durable as the company intended? It is possible that a majority of the buyers of DuraSocks use it as gifts for family or friends, in which case, one may even buy a dozen pairs of them at a time. In no way is this indicative of a decreased durability; it potentially indicates that people like it so much that they want to have more, or to gift more of them to their loved ones. The survey, by not asking its respondents about the reason for the frequency of their purchases, fails to answer this question, and hence creates room for other possibilities like the aforementioned one. If evidence arises in favour of a negative answer to this question, then the argument stands unwarranted.
Third, when the consumers of northeastern American cities reported that their favourite features of the socks were their colours, did they indicate that they did not appreciate its durability? A related question to this one would be: Would shifting to a different manufacturing process retain the consumer base of DuraSocks? It may be the case that people often rate socks based on their appearance and comfort, potentially taking their durability for granted. It may be an afterthought to some, to think of how long they have been using a certain pair of socks. Their appreciation for the colours, thus, might not indicate a different list of priorities; perhaps, if the socks were not to be manufactured using the Endure process, they may also lose their attractiveness and comfortable feel. In this case, a move to get rid of the Endure process may lead to a huge loss if the other features of the sock are affected, or if the customers stop liking its appearance after it wears out faster. The author of the argument has provided no evidence that consumers will continue to purchase the product if the production process is changed, and hence makes an unpersuasive argument in this regard.
In conclusion, the argument, as it stands now, considerably fails in its ability to answer the three questions discussed. These questions are strongly tied to unstated assumptions that the author (the Vice President of Marketing) has made, limiting their perception about the product’s sale. They must conduct a more comprehensive study to answer these questions, and to make a more informed argument that considers all avenues for the company’s success. The current state of the argument does not address these questions, and hence does not form a cogent argument in favour of its conclusions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-11 | Technoblade | 78 | view |
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions Since they were declared a wildl 77
- The United States of America should dispense with the Electoral College At present the president and vice president are selected in a process that does not give equal weight to all voters Apart from Maine and Nebraska states select electoral votes based u 66
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 60
- So long as they are aware of the dangers involved adults should not be legally bound to use seat belts Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take 62
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals In a laboratory study of liquid antibacterial hand soaps a concentrated solution of UltraClean produced a 40 percent greater reduction in the bacteria population than did the 60
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 8 2
No. of Sentences: 27 15
No. of Words: 708 350
No. of Characters: 3440 1500
No. of Different Words: 294 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 5.158 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.859 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.768 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 233 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 179 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 137 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 84 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.222 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.44 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.778 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.289 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.479 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.128 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...DuraSocks must discontinue their use of the Endure manufacturing process to increase their...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 827, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...es not provide a valid argument against the Endure process as a whole. There may be overre...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'Would' requires the base form of the verb: 'shift'
Suggestion: shift
...ed question to this one would be: Would shifting to a different manufacturing process re...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 713, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...socks were not to be manufactured using the Endure process, they may also lose their attra...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 830, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...eel. In this case, a move to get rid of the Endure process may lead to a huge loss if the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, then, third, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.6327345309 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.9520958084 139% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 11.1786427146 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 13.6137724551 147% => OK
Pronoun: 73.0 28.8173652695 253% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 88.0 55.5748502994 158% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 16.3942115768 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3546.0 2260.96107784 157% => OK
No of words: 708.0 441.139720559 160% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00847457627 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.15832040409 4.56307096286 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86952539683 2.78398813304 103% => OK
Unique words: 307.0 204.123752495 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.433615819209 0.468620217663 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1115.1 705.55239521 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 4.96107784431 262% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.70958083832 221% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 10.0 1.67365269461 597% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.22255489022 213% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 19.7664670659 137% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.8473053892 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5520546434 57.8364921388 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.333333333 119.503703932 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2222222222 23.324526521 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.70786347227 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.20758483034 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159587445759 0.218282227539 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513928316769 0.0743258471296 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356183383779 0.0701772020484 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949323426914 0.128457276422 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280768300632 0.0628817314937 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.3799401198 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.3550499002 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.197005988 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.5979740519 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 152.0 98.500998004 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.1389221557 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.