The following appeared in a memorandum written by the chairperson of the West Egg Town Council.
"Two years ago, consultants predicted that West Egg's landfill, which is used for garbage disposal, would be completely filled within five years. During the past two years, however, the town's residents have been recycling twice as much material as they did in previous years. Next month the amount of recycled material — which includes paper, plastic, and metal — should further increase, since charges for pickup of other household garbage will double. Furthermore, over 90 percent of the respondents to a recent survey said that they would do more recycling in the future. Because of our town's strong commitment to recycling, the available space in our landfill should last for considerably longer than predicted."
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The memorandum written by the chairperson of the West Egg Town Council came to conclusion that the based on current measures taken in the Town the landfill may last longer than predicted. This conclusion of the chairperson is based on several unwarranted assumption for the three below reasons.
First, the chairperson assumes that the consultants have not considered the statistics regarding the recycling being take place in the future. For Example, if the consultants have taken in to account current the statistics and historical data to predicts the increase in the level of recycling going to take place in the town, then the increasing number of recycling scenario which author stated will be flawed. Chairperson should provide all the parameter used by the consultants to make this assumption hold water.
Second, how could the increase in charges for pickup of other household garbage will increase the quantity of recycled material? For Example, if already majority of garbage produce is a recycling material and the remaining garbage could be such that it cannot be replaced with any other material, in that case even if the charges may increase to pick up the non-recyclable garbage then even though it will not result in increase of quantity of recycling waste products. The chairperson should have provided any information regarding the material currently be collected from household which has chance to be replaced by a recyclable material so that increase in other garbage collection charges could have forced the people to shift to the recyclable alternatives.
At last, the information collected based on survey could be just another social phenomenon and not actually convert into action. For Example, it is a human tendency to respond based universally supported case. If you take a survey and ask people, do you think we should not spoil of mother earth and will you eager to help to fight against this global warming. The majority of respondent will say that yes, they think human are spoiling the earth and they will do something to help decrease the damage, but most of us don’t do anything rather than answering positively in the survey. This could be same case here, people may have positively responded for good cause. The author must provide the way people could help increase the recycling of garbage then this point has been warranted.
In conclusion, the author prediction is based on many unwarranted assumptions. The author must provide further information to clarify the above stated points which would help strengthening the strong conclusion drawn by the author.
The memorandum written by the chairperson of the West Egg Town Council came to conclusion that the based on current measures taken in the Town the landfill may last longer than predicted. This conclusion of the chairperson is based on several unwarrented assumption for the three below reasons.
The chairperson assume that the consultants have not taken into account the statistics regarding the recycling being take place in the future. For Example, The consultants have taken in to account current the statistics and historical data to predicts the increase in the level of recyling going to take place in the town. If this could be that case then the increasing number of recyling scenario which author stated will be flawed. Chairperson should provide all the parameter used by the consultants to make this assumption hold water.
How could the increase in charges for pickup of other household garbage will increase the quantity of recycled material? For Example, If already majority of garbage produce is a recyling material and the remaining garbage could be such that it cannot be replaced with any other then in that case even the charges may increase to pickup the non-recyclable garbage then even though it will not result in increase of quantity of recyling waste products. The chairperson should of provided any information regarding the material currently be collected from household which has chance to be replaced by the a recylable material so that increase in other garbage collection charges could have forced the people to shift to the recylable alternatives.
The information collected based on survey could be just another social phenomenon and not actually convert into action. For Example, It is a human tendency to respond based universally supported case. If you take a survey and ask people, do you think we should not spoil of mother earth and will you eager to help to fight against this global warming . The majority of respondent will say that yes they think human are spoiling the earth and they will do something to help decreasing the damage but most of us dont do anything rather than answer positively in the survey. This could be same case here, people may have positively responded for good cause. The author must provided the way people could help increase the recyling of garbage then this point have be warrented.
In conclusion, the author prediction is based on many unwarrented assumption. The author must provided further information to clarify the above stated points which would help strenghtening the strong conclusion drawn by the author.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-04 | sanket007 | 69 | view |
| 2019-08-03 | sanket007 | 86 | view |
| 2019-01-05 | swappy1996 | 23 | view |
| 2018-12-29 | missionfission | 26 | view |
| 2018-08-26 | bokachodajamy | 39 | view |
- People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 58
- The following appeared in a memorandum written by the chairperson of the West Egg Town Council."Two years ago, consultants predicted that West Egg's landfill, which is used for garbage disposal, would be completely filled within five years. During the pas 69
- Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or m 16
- The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian, a company that manufactures men's clothing."Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulty obtaining reliable supplies of high-quality wool fabric, we discontinued prod 69
- Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty.W 66
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 424 350
No. of Characters: 2137 1500
No. of Different Words: 188 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.538 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.04 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.665 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 156 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 118 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 88 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 53 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.941 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.002 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.765 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.331 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.592 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.151 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 17, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'assumes'.
Suggestion: assumes
...e three below reasons. The chairperson assume that the consultants have not taken int...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve not taken into account the statistics regarding the recycling being take place...
^^
Line 2, column 324, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...cyling going to take place in the town. If this could be that case then the increa...
^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: OTHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'other than'?
Suggestion: other than
...uch that it cannot be replaced with any other then in that case even the charges may incre...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
...at it cannot be replaced with any other then in that case even the charges may incre...
^^^^
Line 3, column 467, Rule ID: MODAL_OF[1]
Message: It's never correct to use "of" after a modal verb. Use 'should have', or, in informal register, 'should've'.
Suggestion: should have; should've
...ecyling waste products. The chairperson should of provided any information regarding the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 598, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...hold which has chance to be replaced by the a recylable material so that increase in ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se. If you take a survey and ask people, do you think we should not spoil of moth...
^^
Line 4, column 352, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...elp to fight against this global warming . The majority of respondent will say tha...
^^
Line 4, column 475, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to decrease' or 'decrease'.
Suggestion: to decrease; decrease
...arth and they will do something to help decreasing the damage but most of us dont do anyth...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 512, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...lp decreasing the damage but most of us dont do anything rather than answer positive...
^^^^
Line 4, column 762, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...ecyling of garbage then this point have be warrented. In conclusion, the author p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, may, regarding, so, then, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.9520958084 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 55.5748502994 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2168.0 2260.96107784 96% => OK
No of words: 424.0 441.139720559 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11320754717 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71385016148 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 204.123752495 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448113207547 0.468620217663 96% => OK
syllable_count: 673.2 705.55239521 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.7695663419 57.8364921388 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.529411765 119.503703932 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9411764706 23.324526521 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17647058824 5.70786347227 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.25449101796 228% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161774878483 0.218282227539 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585410617871 0.0743258471296 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486944634844 0.0701772020484 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100832196285 0.128457276422 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588484382094 0.0628817314937 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.3799401198 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.5979740519 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.32208582834 95% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 98.500998004 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.