The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News:
"The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg. Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions- Since they were declared a wildlife sanctuary in 2004, development along the coastal wetlands has been prohibited. Now local development interests are lobbying for the West Lansburg council to allow an access road to-be built along the edge of wetlands. Neighboring Eastern Carpenteria: which had a similar sanctuary: has seen its sea otter population decline since the repeal of its sanctuary status in 1948. In order to preserve the regions biodiversity and ensure a healthy environment, the West Lansburg council should not allow the road to be built "
The letter was written by the editor of West Lansburg news which states that with the construction of a road in coastal Westland of West Lansburg the population of tufted groundhog would decline, comparing it with the effects seen in neighboring Eastern Carpenteria.
One of the main reason for opposing the construction of access road is that the population of sea otter reduced in Eastern Carpentria. But in this situation nowhere it can be said that removal of sanctuary status is the main reason as there is no proof or data provided or no investigation or research is done by an agency or a group stating editors claim.
Even West Lansburg council can allow construction of the road without having any change in sanctuary status of the area. The road will improve the transportation in the are and as sanctuary staus still would be their minimum damage would occur to the environment.
Comparing something with the situation in 1978 is not rational as today's surveillance system are much more advanced and with good animal tracking technology preservation of wildlife could be improved even further.
So according to me, there are many problems in the proposal of the editor comparing head to head two different regions in the different era is like comparing apples and oranges. So council should think about all possibilities and conditions before giving orders regarding the issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-23 | Pruthviraj R Patil | 55 | view |
| 2018-07-06 | keyur | 33 | view |
| 2016-12-06 | cravisjan97 | 50 | view |
| 2016-11-27 | Sunny udhani | 50 | view |
| 2016-09-15 | vrs1211 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: head-to-head
...in the proposal of the editor comparing head to head two different regions in the different ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, still, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.6327345309 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 13.6137724551 29% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 28.8173652695 28% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 55.5748502994 63% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1177.0 2260.96107784 52% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 224.0 441.139720559 51% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25446428571 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.56307096286 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33216091999 2.78398813304 120% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 204.123752495 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.468620217663 130% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 705.55239521 51% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 19.7664670659 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.8473053892 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.2152175134 57.8364921388 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.125 119.503703932 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 23.324526521 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.70786347227 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144234981041 0.218282227539 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561146545548 0.0743258471296 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0961957427727 0.0701772020484 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0794224091737 0.128457276422 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111465602111 0.0628817314937 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.3799401198 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.3550499002 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.197005988 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.5979740519 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.32208582834 115% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 98.500998004 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 12.3882235529 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.1389221557 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.