The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station.
"Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station's coverage of weather and local news. In addition, local businesses that used to advertise during our late-night news program have canceled their advertising contracts with us. Therefore, in order to attract more viewers to our news programs and to avoid losing any further advertising revenues, we should expand our coverage of weather and local news on all our news programs."
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
The author makes a connection between reducing the amount of local news and weather coverage with the complaints received and canceling the advertisement contracts. However, the author doesn't pay attention to the number of complaints received or don't mention any evidence related to other possible reasons that might help cancel the contracts. By providing these evidences he/she mistakenly concludes that we should restore the news to its former level.
First the author mentions that most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with station level of coverage. However, he/she fails to be punctilious in noticing the amounts of complaints. Perhaps our overall complaints reduced by 20% and in turn the former complaints about news coverage reduced as well. It's not fair to judge only by data we have now and conclude because we have no idea of what was going on before.
The author mentions the late night news itself and we don't provide any information about its viewers. It might be the other programs' viewer that complained about other coverage policies, we just don't know. Because most of the viewers that care more about local news especially weather precast don't watch the TV at late night. We don't know about the watching pattern of the local residents. By providing more detailed information we can see the whole picture of what's happening to our viewers.
Finally the original reason behind the canceling the contracts might be other thing. For example perhaps they increase the price for advertisement of maybe companies find another local network that works better for them. Without paying any attention to these possible scenarios we cannot conclude that with restoring the news coverage to its former level we can immediately attract the lost contracts.
To sum, based on the information presented in the argument and having no idea about the detail information about complaints and also the pattern of the hours that viewers spend in front of TVs, it's difficult to conclude that with restoring the former level we could re-attract the lost local businesses. However with providing more precise information we could have a better understanding of what should we decide.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-06 | mhayat29 | 55 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | benson zhang | 55 | view |
| 2019-08-05 | sea0215 | 77 | view |
| 2019-06-26 | madiha3 | 89 | view |
| 2019-06-22 | Mrunal47286 | 67 | view |
- TPO 42 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Governments should make it possible for children to attend preschool (early childhood education programs, for example, for three-year-old children) at no costs for children’s families. 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Governments should make it possible for children to attend preschool (early childhood education programs, for example, for three-year-old children) at no costs for children’s families. 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Governments should make it possible for children to attend preschool (early childhood education programs, for example, for three-year-old children) at no costs for children’s families. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Governments should make it possible for children to attend preschool (early childhood education programs, for example, for three-year-old children) at no costs for children’s families.Use reasons and 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The author makes a connection between re...
^^
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...tisement contracts. However, the author doesnt pay attention to the number of complain...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...to the number of complaints received or dont mention any evidence related to other p...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... restore the news to its former level. First the author mentions that most of t...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e no idea of what was going on before. The author mentions the late night news ...
^^
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...tions the late night news itself and we dont provide any information about its viewe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'programs'' or 'program's'?
Suggestion: programs'; program's
...bout its viewers. It might be the other programs viewer that complained about other cove...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... about other coverage policies, we just dont know. Because most of the viewers that ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r coverage policies, we just dont know. Because most of the viewers that care more abou...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...t local news especially weather precast dont watch the TV at late night. We dont kno...
^^^^
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ast dont watch the TV at late night. We dont know about the watching pattern of the ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 463, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...rmation we can see the whole picture of whats happening to our viewers. Finally th...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ure of whats happening to our viewers. Finally the original reason behind the c...
^^
Line 4, column 3, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...e of whats happening to our viewers. Finally the original reason behind the cancelin...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mmediately attract the lost contracts. To sum, based on the information present...
^^
Line 5, column 306, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...d re-attract the lost local businesses. However with providing more precise information...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, so, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 19.6327345309 25% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 28.8173652695 132% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 55.5748502994 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1850.0 2260.96107784 82% => OK
No of words: 356.0 441.139720559 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19662921348 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61579452796 2.78398813304 94% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 204.123752495 84% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483146067416 0.468620217663 103% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 705.55239521 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7239516024 57.8364921388 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.823529412 119.503703932 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9411764706 23.324526521 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58823529412 5.70786347227 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 16.0 5.25449101796 305% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143760109103 0.218282227539 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566026296544 0.0743258471296 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575620707864 0.0701772020484 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0884266166919 0.128457276422 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428876819622 0.0628817314937 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.3799401198 94% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.3550499002 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.5979740519 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.32208582834 96% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 98.500998004 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.