The argument claims that contracting with Satellite Waste Company instead of Arko Trash Collection led to a reduction in the number of visitors to the beach in Bridge Bay City. Stated in this way the argument fails to mention several key factors, on the basis, it could be evaluated. The argument's conclusion is based on a presumption for which there is no conclusive evidence. As a result, the argument is weak, unconvincing, and riddled with errors.
First, the argument readily assumes that this issue is related to changing the company which was responsible for the collection of the waste garbage from the city to another company. This statement is strict and not substantiated in any way. for instance, the writer does not provide the details in the new contract with the last company which may have some conditions for cleaning the beach. Moreover, the argument should give notes for the other sides of the city because it may be clean without any complaints. The argument could have been much clearer if it explicitly stated the conditions of the contracts with the new company especially related to the beach.
Second, the argument claims that the new company has inadequate methods of collecting the garbage. this is again a very weak and unsupported claim as the argument does not demonstrate any correlation between Arko and Satellite companies. For example, the argument does not add any information about the staff, instruments, and capacity of machines of the new company in comparison with the old firm. If the argument had provided evidence with statistical numbers to compare both companies then the argument would have been more convincing.
In conclusion, the argument is flawed for the reasons mentioned above and thus unconvincing. It could be considerably strengthened if the author clearly mentioned all the relevant facts about the new contract. It is necessary to have a complete of all contributing factors in order to evaluate the merits of a specific situation.
- In a recent citywide poll 15 percent more residents said that they watch television programs about the visual arts than was the case in a poll conducted five years ago During these past five years the number of people visiting our city s art museu 58
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and suppo
- Some people believe that our ever increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to sch 76
- Some people believe that our ever increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 289, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arguments'' or 'argument's'?
Suggestion: arguments'; argument's
...n the basis, it could be evaluated. The arguments conclusion is based on a presumption fo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...trict and not substantiated in any way. for instance, the writer does not provide t...
^^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...uate methods of collecting the garbage. this is again a very weak and unsupported cl...
^^^^
Line 5, column 401, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ompany in comparison with the old firm. If the argument had provided evidence with...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 28.8173652695 42% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 55.5748502994 74% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 16.3942115768 146% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 2260.96107784 74% => OK
No of words: 326.0 441.139720559 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13496932515 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85694659591 2.78398813304 103% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 204.123752495 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518404907975 0.468620217663 111% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 705.55239521 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7320097317 57.8364921388 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.625 119.503703932 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 23.324526521 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.70786347227 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145587141119 0.218282227539 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514270726143 0.0743258471296 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602933786231 0.0701772020484 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0909973517258 0.128457276422 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470415213829 0.0628817314937 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.3799401198 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.3550499002 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 98.500998004 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 289, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arguments'' or 'argument's'?
Suggestion: arguments'; argument's
...n the basis, it could be evaluated. The arguments conclusion is based on a presumption fo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...trict and not substantiated in any way. for instance, the writer does not provide t...
^^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...uate methods of collecting the garbage. this is again a very weak and unsupported cl...
^^^^
Line 5, column 401, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ompany in comparison with the old firm. If the argument had provided evidence with...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 28.8173652695 42% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 55.5748502994 74% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 16.3942115768 146% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 2260.96107784 74% => OK
No of words: 326.0 441.139720559 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13496932515 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85694659591 2.78398813304 103% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 204.123752495 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518404907975 0.468620217663 111% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 705.55239521 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7320097317 57.8364921388 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.625 119.503703932 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 23.324526521 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.70786347227 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145587141119 0.218282227539 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514270726143 0.0743258471296 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602933786231 0.0701772020484 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0909973517258 0.128457276422 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470415213829 0.0628817314937 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.3799401198 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.3550499002 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 98.500998004 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.