The following is a recommendation from the city manager of Bridge Bay.
The following is a recommendation from the city manager of Bridge Bay.
“Last year, the number of visits to our local beach in Bridge Bay was 50 percent lower
than the year before. Early last year we ended our contract with Arko Trash Collection, a
company that had serviced local garbage collection for the past twenty years. We switched
at that time to Satellite Waste Corporation, another trash collection company. In nearby
Ocean Harbor, where Arko has continued to provide garbage collection, the beaches are
experiencing record levels of attendance. Meanwhile, in Bridge Bay, complaints about
garbage on our beach have increased this year. Clearly, inadequate garbage collection on
our beach by Satellite has led to the significant drop in visitors. Therefore, in order to
restore visitor numbers to our local beach, we recommend resuming our contract with
Arko as soon as possible.”
Many questions demand an answer, before a conclusive decision regarding, restoring Arko Trash Collection can be taken. Are the locals complaining about inadequate trash collection? Is there any factor, other than cleanliness which could be impacting people's willingness to visit Bridge Bay Beach? Has Ocean Harbor invested more towards attracting tourists? We will evaluate all of these questions in this essay.
The recommendation from the city manager mentions that, "complaints about garbage on our beach have increased this year". It is imperative to ask who are the people making these complaints? Are they tourists or locals? If only tourists are complaining then it is possible that their origin countries are generally cleaner than Bridge Bay beach, with no fault of Satellite Waste Corporation. Exactly, what is the increase in number of complaints? An increase of 5-10% could be attributed to natural reasons such as increase in economic activity, while an increase of over 20% would signify something fundamentally wrong with the new garbage collection system. Are people across the city making more complaints, or only a particular group of people are making more complaints? In the latter case, it becomes important to probe if such a group of people have other hidden intentions than just complaining about cleanliness.
We must also evaluate factors beyond the control of Satellite Waste Corporation to fairly determine the reason for a 50% drop in numer of tourists. Is the water at Bridge Bay as clean as it used to be? It is possible that the local industry has suddenly started polluting the sea water, resulting in detioriation of water quality at Bridge Bay Beach, which will drive away the tourists. Is there a sudden increase in animals or plants such as string rays at Bridge Bay, causing people to choose Ocean Harbor for their well-being? It is possible that people are staying away from Bridge Bay in order to enjoy a trouble free experience. Is there an increase in unlawful activities at Bridge Bay Beach? If crime is increasing at Bridge Bay, it is logical for people to consider alternative beaches to ensure their own safety.
We also need to look if Ocean harbor has actively taken measures such as more advertising or building more facilities to attract tourists. International advertising would attract a lot more people to Ocean harbor, and people will go their by leaving Bridge Bay, which could be the reason for dip in tourists number at Bridge Bay. If Ocean harbor has invested more in building facilities such as water sports, amusement park rides, better food stalls, then Ocean harbor will naturally attract more tourists looking for a memorable holiday experience, leading to a dip in tourist numbers at Bridge Bay beach.
In conclusion, many questions need to be answered first before fall in tourists number at Bridge Bay beach can be blamed on Satellite Waste Corporation. The city manager must answer these questions before restoration of Arko Trash Collection can be considered.
- The following is a recommendation from the city manager of Bridge Bay.The following is a recommendation from the city manager of Bridge Bay.“Last year, the number of visits to our local beach in Bridge Bay was 50 percent lowerthan the year before. Early 58
- Using a smartphone before bed worsens sleep quality 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, regarding, so, then, well, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.6327345309 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 28.8173652695 87% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 55.5748502994 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2589.0 2260.96107784 115% => OK
No of words: 493.0 441.139720559 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25152129817 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71206996034 4.56307096286 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80693287443 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 204.123752495 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474645030426 0.468620217663 101% => OK
syllable_count: 795.6 705.55239521 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 19.7664670659 126% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.6179694193 57.8364921388 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.56 119.503703932 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.72 23.324526521 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36 5.70786347227 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.20758483034 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270237725417 0.218282227539 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860510725096 0.0743258471296 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811817611789 0.0701772020484 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151374770621 0.128457276422 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523577793966 0.0628817314937 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.3799401198 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.3550499002 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.5979740519 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 98.500998004 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 12.3882235529 40% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.