The recommendations that the government of Tagus should do everything it can to promote the new type of millet is good only if it is well thought and is supported by facts and logic. If the logic isn't sound, the recommendation would not be worth its salt.
While the new type of millet has high content of Vitamin A, have there been any studies which show that the consumption of these millets will actually lead to higher Vitamin A in the human body? Many food items have high amounts of certain vitamin or mineral but the human body cannot make use of it efficiently.
The recommendation says that as the newer seeds are expensive, the farmers will be paid subsidies for farming the new variety of this millet. This raises a question of who will be paying for these subsidies? Also, one needs to look into the cost of providing vitamin A to the residents of Tagus and if these costs are comparable to the subsidy.
The assumption that since millet is already a staple food in Tagus, people will readily adopt the new variety is not justified. Was there any survey amongst the Tagus people? People in general resist change and since this affects their food, changing over could be difficult.
There need to be studies which show the efficacy of these millets in combating Vitamin A deficiency, cost benefits of growing these crops as compared to Vitamin A supplements and who would pay for them, and most importantly will the people readily adopt the new variety of millet. Only after these points are clarified, the recommendation holds its weight.
- Issue Essay:-People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 16
- GRE Argument: An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, far 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ported by facts and logic. If the logic isnt sound, the recommendation would not be ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 218, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ople in general resist change and since this affects their food, changing over could...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'well', 'while', 'in general']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.266211604096 0.25644967241 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.156996587031 0.15541462614 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0648464163823 0.0836205057962 78% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0477815699659 0.0520304965353 92% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0238907849829 0.0272364105082 88% => OK
Prepositions: 0.126279863481 0.125424944231 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0409556313993 0.0416121511921 98% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.58292039848 2.79052419416 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0238907849829 0.026700313972 89% => OK
Particles: 0.00341296928328 0.001811407834 188% => OK
Determiners: 0.126279863481 0.113004496875 112% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.037542662116 0.0255425247493 147% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0136518771331 0.0127820249294 107% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1563.0 2731.13054187 57% => OK
No of words: 271.0 446.07635468 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76752767528 6.12365571057 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.57801047555 89% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.29889298893 0.378187486979 79% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.228782287823 0.287650121315 80% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.110701107011 0.208842608468 53% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0848708487085 0.135150697306 63% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58292039848 2.79052419416 93% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 207.018472906 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535055350554 0.469332199767 114% => OK
Word variations: 52.934719671 52.1807786196 101% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 20.039408867 60% => OK
Sentence length: 22.5833333333 23.2022227129 97% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.2092534541 57.7814097925 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.25 141.986410481 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 23.2022227129 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.724660767414 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.58251231527 56% => OK
Readability: 45.4615621156 51.9672348444 87% => OK
Elegance: 1.89552238806 1.8405768891 103% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402957466564 0.441005458295 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.125015117002 0.135418324435 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0788491084301 0.0829849096947 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.651025588064 0.58762219726 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.172249141615 0.147661913831 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168688224174 0.193483328276 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107165493668 0.0970749176394 110% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.273319330289 0.42659136922 64% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0619112155195 0.0774707102158 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260395654124 0.312017818177 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726306053446 0.0698173142475 104% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.33743842365 60% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.87684729064 44% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.82512315271 83% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 6.46551724138 77% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 5.36822660099 56% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.82389162562 71% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 14.657635468 68% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
More content wanted. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.