A person who makes decisions based on emotions and justifies them later is generally considered to be a poorer decision maker when compared to someone who gives a logical thought to them. A good decision maker is one who makes decisions logically but at the same time, gives an emotional thought to them.
One of the issues with emotional decision makers is that their decisions might seem good to them at that point of time, but those decisions can have long term problems. These problems arise as they weren't thought of by the decision maker. One such example is when a person is hungry, they do not give much thought to what they eat and how much do they eat. However if a person makes food decisions logically based on their energy requirements, it is good for them in the long run for having a good health.
Moreover, the result of many decisions affect not only the decision maker but also affect the people for whom the decision is being taken. For example, many parents do not correct the mistakes made by their children as they feel wrong in reprimanding. However, unless children are told the difference between right and wrong, they will not be able to learn. Thus, emotional decision taken by parents affect their own children.
It is a good practice in general to logically think out the problem in hand and make decisions. However, not all decisions can be taken based on pure logic and no emotions. For example, building a dam has great economic benefits, allows for the generation of hydroelectric power and benefits the society in general. So logically it is a very good decision to build a dam. However it often leads to deforestation, changes the course of rivers, loss of habitat and many times causes floods. So without an emotional thought, choosing a potential site for building a dam could be a catastrophe.
Hence a good decision maker is not the one who makes decisions based on pure logic but one who gives both, logical and emotional thought in making a decision.
- GRE Argument: An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, far 50
- Issue Essay:-People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me, gives an emotional thought to them. One of the issues with emotional decisio...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'termed'.
Suggestion: termed
...time, but those decisions can have long term problems. These problems arise as they ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
... problems. These problems arise as they werent thought of by the decision maker. One s...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...what they eat and how much do they eat. However if a person makes food decisions logica...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 372, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...is a very good decision to build a dam. However it often leads to deforestation, change...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...lding a dam could be a catastrophe. Hence a good decision maker is not the one wh...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'thus', 'for example', 'in general']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.225130890052 0.240241500013 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.175392670157 0.157235817809 112% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0916230366492 0.0880659088768 104% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0628272251309 0.0497285424764 126% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0497382198953 0.0444667217837 112% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0968586387435 0.12292977631 79% => OK
Participles: 0.0523560209424 0.0406280797675 129% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.55473332124 2.79330140395 91% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0261780104712 0.030933414821 85% => OK
Particles: 0.00261780104712 0.0016655270985 157% => OK
Determiners: 0.102094240838 0.0997080785238 102% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0130890052356 0.0249443105267 52% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0261780104712 0.0148568991511 176% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2000.0 2732.02544248 73% => OK
No of words: 349.0 452.878318584 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73065902579 6.0361032391 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.58838876751 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.315186246418 0.366273622748 86% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.249283667622 0.280924506359 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.177650429799 0.200843997647 88% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.100286532951 0.132149295362 76% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55473332124 2.79330140395 91% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 219.290929204 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481375358166 0.48968727796 98% => OK
Word variations: 49.7604328169 55.4138127331 90% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6194690265 82% => OK
Sentence length: 20.5294117647 23.380412469 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.382721478 59.4972553346 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.647058824 141.124799967 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5294117647 23.380412469 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.588235294118 0.674092028746 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 45.4577785269 51.4728631049 88% => OK
Elegance: 1.3 1.64882698954 79% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209699324229 0.391690518653 54% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.119442103426 0.123202303941 97% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.111071289164 0.077325440228 144% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.538793781069 0.547984918172 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.183425713388 0.149214159877 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825451175836 0.161403998019 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723510479468 0.0892212321368 81% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.287870941731 0.385218514788 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.047487250025 0.0692045440612 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149717935397 0.275328986314 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515332605179 0.0653680567796 79% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.4325221239 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.30420353982 151% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.66592920354 191% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.