Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7,000 years ago, and within 3,000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands were extinct. Previous archaeological findings have suggested that early humans generally relied on both fishing and hunting for food; since archaeologists have discovered numerous sites in the Kaliko Islands where the bones of fish were discarded, it is likely that the humans also hunted the mammals. Furthermore, researchers have uncovered simple tools, such as stone knives, that could be used for hunting. The only clear explanation is that humans caused the extinction of the various mammal species through excessive hunting.
Write a response in which you discuss one or more alternative explanations that could rival the proposed explanation and explain how your explanation(s) can plausibly account for the facts presented in the argument.
In the argument, the author concludes that humans are the reason for the extinction of mammal species. The above conclusion is based on findings of archaeologists that humans in Kaliko Island used stones and knives. However, while the conclusion drawn might hold water, it rests on several unwarranted evidences that if not substantiated would dramatically undermine the persuasiveness of the argument. Hence, the author must provide the following three pieces of evidences.
Firstly, the author suggests that since archaeologists found remains of fish bones, humans were the reason for hunting mammals. However, the discarded bones of fished might not been due to the hunting of humans. Maybe there were animal species which hunted and ate those fishes and discarded the remains. For instance, animals like bears and birds might have hunted and ate fishes and they might have discarded the remains in different parts of the island. Therefore, the author did not consider the other possible species which might have hunted the fishes. Also, it is ambiguous that if people perhaps hunted fishes, it doesn’t mean that they also hunted mammals.
Secondly, archaeologists discovered that humans used tools in Kaliko Island. However, that doesn’t mean that humans used those tool for hunting. There is also a possibility that they used knives to build houses and for cooking. At that time, humans didn’t have the supply of cement and large machines to construct houses so the only material to build houses were leaves and branches. Knives can be used to cut the leaves and stones might have been used to tame the branches to make it flat. Thus, the author didn’t give information of how well people were educated to build houses.
Thirdly, there are many reasons for extinction of mammals. One of the reasons would have been climate change or maybe global warming. If that were so, then humans wouldn’t have been the reason for the extinction of mammals.
In conclusion, the argument as it stands now is flawed with several unstated evidences. If the author is able to provide the above three pieces of evidences and perhaps conduct more research on human’s lifestyle, then there is a possibility that humans would have been the reason for the extinction of mammals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-21 | Shruti29 | 66 | view |
| 2022-12-15 | abhikhanna | 58 | view |
| 2022-07-26 | alphagreuser | 53 | view |
| 2022-06-20 | dinesh sunny | 50 | view |
| 2022-05-19 | Saugat Basnet | 53 | view |
- Many important discoveries or creations are accidental it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and 58
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your 50
- Requiring university students to take a variety of courses outside their major fields of study is the best way to ensure that students become truly educated Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 83
- The following appeared in a letter from a firm providing investment advice to a client Homes in the northeastern United States where winters are typically cold have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating Last year that region experienced t 58
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your 50
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 376 350
No. of Characters: 1842 1500
No. of Different Words: 161 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.403 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.899 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.457 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 140 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 82 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 49 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 33 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.905 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.739 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.762 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.327 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.327 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.099 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 13.6137724551 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 55.5748502994 68% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1909.0 2260.96107784 84% => OK
No of words: 371.0 441.139720559 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14555256065 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5670426581 2.78398813304 92% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 204.123752495 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452830188679 0.468620217663 97% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 705.55239521 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4450300224 57.8364921388 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9047619048 119.503703932 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 23.324526521 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.04761904762 5.70786347227 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.67664670659 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177314831282 0.218282227539 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616304314197 0.0743258471296 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626351505812 0.0701772020484 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10577594926 0.128457276422 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226887177358 0.0628817314937 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.3799401198 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.3550499002 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.5979740519 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.32208582834 95% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 98.500998004 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.