In last year's mayoral election in Town T... environment of Town T
The author claims that since Mr. Keating used the Television as a medium to highlight the issue of natural environment in the Town T and won the election, Mr Miller must follow the similar strategy to ensure a win in the upcoming elections. Besides the assumption that the evidence presented is correct the argument hinges on several other assumptions that need to be tested before arriving at any conclusion.
The main assumption that the reason for Mr. Keating's victory is because of his last minute strategy to launch a Television advertisement series on preserving natural environment needs to be tested. At present this evidence stands dubious as it does not specify whether Keating's coming on Television or his focus on preserving the natural environment was the reason for his victory. It might even be the case that neither was the true reason. Maybe, the citizen of Town T liked Keating irrespective of the fact that he comes on television advertisements or not. If, this is proved to be true then the main assumption that supports the argument stands negatory.
Suppose, if we assume that above mentioned assumption is correct, then in that case Keating would have had worked on the issue of preserving natural environment. In which case, making preserving natural environment as a cynosure of poll campaign would not be a smart idea for Miller. The author must present evidence that highlights that it is still an issue that is relevant to the citizen of the Town T.
To sum, the evidence that the author provided in support of the argument is very weak. Broad conclusions are made based on assumptions which lacks support. It would be impossible to make any useful any analysis on fate of Mr. Miller based on the presented arguments unless more evidences are provided.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-12 | rali | 63 | view |
| 2016-07-28 | testbigabhinav | 50 | view |
- "Our previous experience has been that our stores are most profitable in areas where residents are highly concerned with leading healthy lives. We should therefore build one of our new stores in Plainsville, which clearly has many such residents. Plainsvi 70
- The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 50
- If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified, the job should go to the applicant with more experience 66
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 47
- Commuters complain that increased rush hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time The favored proposal of the motorists lobby is to widen the highway adding an additional lane of traffic Opponents 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 62, Rule ID: REASON_IS_BECAUSE[1]
Message: Probably an incorrect phrase. Use 'the reason 'is that''.
Suggestion: is that
...hat the reason for Mr. Keatings victory is because of his last minute strategy to launch a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 561, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...es on television advertisements or not. If, this is proved to be true then the mai...
^^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s relevant to the citizen of the Town T. To sum, the evidence that the author pro...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'still', 'then']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.266457680251 0.25644967241 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.181818181818 0.15541462614 117% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0815047021944 0.0836205057962 97% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0282131661442 0.0520304965353 54% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0282131661442 0.0272364105082 104% => OK
Prepositions: 0.153605015674 0.125424944231 122% => OK
Participles: 0.0564263322884 0.0416121511921 136% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.77151382621 2.79052419416 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0282131661442 0.026700313972 106% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.128526645768 0.113004496875 114% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0188087774295 0.0255425247493 74% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0156739811912 0.0127820249294 123% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1783.0 2731.13054187 65% => OK
No of words: 300.0 446.07635468 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.94333333333 6.12365571057 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.57801047555 91% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.373333333333 0.378187486979 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.283333333333 0.287650121315 98% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.196666666667 0.208842608468 94% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.12 0.135150697306 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77151382621 2.79052419416 99% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 207.018472906 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503333333333 0.469332199767 107% => OK
Word variations: 50.1875551427 52.1807786196 96% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 20.039408867 60% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.2022227129 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9683549252 57.7814097925 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.583333333 141.986410481 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 23.2022227129 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.724660767414 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.14285714286 78% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.58251231527 84% => OK
Readability: 53.3333333333 51.9672348444 103% => OK
Elegance: 2.0 1.8405768891 109% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130970676628 0.441005458295 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.166907681242 0.135418324435 123% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.089453766728 0.0829849096947 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.615144206321 0.58762219726 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.128300898756 0.147661913831 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631088500685 0.193483328276 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593097110889 0.0970749176394 61% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.439727342019 0.42659136922 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0969779189154 0.0774707102158 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102797044962 0.312017818177 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396022928243 0.0698173142475 57% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.33743842365 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.87684729064 44% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.82512315271 21% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 8.0 6.46551724138 124% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 5.36822660099 56% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.82389162562 35% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 14.657635468 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.