Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
Inoculations against cow flu can be routinely administered to all people if certain facts and figures are kept mind. First and foremost question that needs to be cleared is- how deleterious are the effects to cow flu and whether or not they’re curable post their occurrence. Another fact we need to find is whether there are other reasons why the flu is detected only in certain areas and not on others. Certain areas may have industries and gases that trigger the virus that injects the flu in our body.
Additionally, we’ll have to conduct experiments to find out the harmful effects of inoculations on human body. There’s no point on providing such vaccines of they are more malignant than the flu itself. The efficiency of the inoculations needs to be taken into account. We’ll need a clear data on the components of the vaccine that may or may not have adverse impacts on human body.
We also need clear facts about the people that die after inoculations actually die because of the vaccines or because of the flu. There’s a possibility that the vaccines are not able to completely cure the disease or make the body resistant. That is why the flu prevails. Post-partum of the body after it dies to check the kind of virus that killed it would help us in clearing this question.
Only after we’re clear on the above flaws and questions about the effects and effectiveness of inoculation on the body. And also about the harmful effects of the flu itself, we’ll be able to make a clear perception on whether or not the inoculations can be permitted.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 278 350
No. of Characters: 1262 1500
No. of Different Words: 130 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.083 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.54 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.589 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 71 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 65 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 35 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 25 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.857 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.878 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.364 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.564 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.109 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... to know both, the employees grievences as well as the company's status in the outsid...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 33.0505617978 15% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 2235.4752809 64% => OK
No of words: 272.0 442.535393258 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26838235294 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85958283535 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 215.323595506 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470588235294 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5209526272 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.272727273 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81818181818 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195202791151 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827884741683 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672573410401 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13083697139 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383433701593 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 100.480337079 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.