The author argues that innoculation of the cow flu cannot be routinely administrated as there is a small risk of undesirable death, despite of the potential effectiveness of the innoculation. The claim cited by the author seemed convincing but later reflected that its is based to irrelevant assumption.
First of all, the author cited that the innoculation of cow flu result in more deaths then that caused due to diseases. However the author failed to stated the evidence for the same. However, it is not clear that whether the disease is contagious. Also since the government is not taking efforts to crab the spread of diseases it is possible that the number of death due to diseases is more.
Secondly, the author used the words such as "more lives" and "small possibilities" in the articl in order to state the statistics making the artical more relevant. But he fails to give the number of lives saved due to innoculation and the number of death due to innoculation. This statistic could be used to carry out further research thus resulting in low death rate.
In conclusion, the author can strengthen his argument by including statistical evidence by carring out a study survey or including certain medical records or government publication to support the argument.
- it is responsibility of goverment to support the artist 50
- “Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot pe 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es that innoculationof thecow flu cannot be routinely administrated as there is a...
^^
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... as there is a small risk of undesirable death, despite of the potential effecti...
^^
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sirable death, despite of the potential effectiveness of the innoculation. The c...
^^
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ess of the innoculation. The claim cited by the author seemed convincing but late...
^^
Line 2, column 14, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o irrelevant assumption. First of all, the author cited that the innoculation o...
^^
Line 2, column 76, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_NNS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'more deaths than'?
Suggestion: more deaths than
...t the innoculation of cow flu result in more deaths then that caused due to diseases. However t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 88, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...lation of cow flu result in more deaths then that caused due to diseases. However t...
^^^^
Line 2, column 123, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...aths then that caused due to diseases. However the author failed to stated the evidenc...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ated the evidence for the same. However, it is not clear that whether the disease...
^^
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ath due to diseases is more. Secondly, the author used the words such as '...
^^
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the words such as 'more lives' and 'small possibilities' in ...
^^
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...os; and 'small possibilities' in the articl in order to state the stat...
^^
Line 4, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ting in low death rate. In conclusion, the author can strengthen his argument b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, second, secondly, so, then, thus, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.6327345309 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.9520958084 23% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 28.8173652695 42% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 55.5748502994 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1084.0 2260.96107784 48% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 211.0 441.139720559 48% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13744075829 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 4.56307096286 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10212653785 2.78398813304 111% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 204.123752495 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582938388626 0.468620217663 124% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 705.55239521 49% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 19.7664670659 51% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9805063265 57.8364921388 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.4 119.503703932 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 23.324526521 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.7 5.70786347227 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 13.0 5.25449101796 247% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168247888148 0.218282227539 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640976499064 0.0743258471296 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048111705261 0.0701772020484 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0894965273021 0.128457276422 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550537258486 0.0628817314937 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.3799401198 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.3550499002 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.32208582834 108% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 98.500998004 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.