Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The mentioned statement states that inoculations must be routinely administered in the affected area of disease but this can pose a risk to human lives, although it is less probable to happen. This argument here contains some controversially vague quantifiers such as "small probability" and phrases like "might be saved" and "as a result" indicating that there is an ample need of a thorough study of the area of endemic for concrete results and quantifiable data to comprehend the reasons of deaths actually from inoculations or some other factors present in the surrounding environment like mode of conducting inoculations or affected patients. Apart from relying on data available from previous studies in the area and researching its causes from a theoretical perspective, it is also crucial for an empirical study to take place in the current scenario and yield evidences needed for any further step to be taken.
Human lives cannot be taken for granted and ethical guidelines associated with such decisions must be strictly followed and adhered throughout the administration. The research study should present concrete data about the probability of deaths before, during and after inoculations. Further, not only the reasons accountable for the deaths must be ruled out but also the area-specific conditions that breed those causes. The studies should reflect on other measures to prevent its occurrence as well as recurrence. People in the area needs to be educated to detect its early signs and address them with professional help. Moreover, what factors set the prerequisite conditions to administer routine inoculations must be specified and identify its side-effects which can affect the quality of life and well-being of the patients.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.0 out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 15
No. of Words: 274 350
No. of Characters: 1453 1500
No. of Different Words: 160 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.069 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.303 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.005 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 105 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 88 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 63 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 42 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 30.444 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 16.621 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.397 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.397 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.074 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 664, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eover, what factors set the prerequisite conditions to administer routine inocula...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, moreover, so, well, apart from, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 11.1786427146 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 13.6137724551 29% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 28.8173652695 45% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 55.5748502994 70% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 2260.96107784 67% => OK
No of words: 274.0 441.139720559 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5 5.12650576532 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.56307096286 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1923960785 2.78398813304 115% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 204.123752495 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594890510949 0.468620217663 127% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 705.55239521 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 19.7664670659 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.8473053892 131% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 114.496104845 57.8364921388 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.444444444 119.503703932 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4444444444 23.324526521 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.88888888889 5.70786347227 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 5.15768463074 39% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156326126612 0.218282227539 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065612675316 0.0743258471296 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407403085632 0.0701772020484 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124360270495 0.128457276422 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00599081898182 0.0628817314937 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 14.3799401198 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 48.3550499002 67% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.1628742515 181% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.197005988 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.5979740519 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.71 8.32208582834 129% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 98.500998004 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 31.5 12.3882235529 254% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.1389221557 126% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.9071856287 168% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.