n
The letter to the editor seems at first glance extremely flawed in several points. In fact, the argumentation proposed in support of the thesis does not appears to be cogent, weaking the quality of the article as a whole.
In particular, among the several illogical argumentations, it is not clear which are the bases to affirm that without the construction of the road, the biodiversity and a healthy envirorment would be preserved.
First, the "ancient records" mentioned at the beginning, around which the argumentation of the declining population of groundhog is builded, might not be correct. In fact, it is not clear at which age the records refers to and indeed, it is highly probable that the nuber enounced might not be correct as the technology and the math used to arrive at that number might be old and hence not accurate.
Second, the fact that the neighboring city of Estern Carpenteira showed a strong decline in the population of the animals since the repeal of the status of sancturary, might not necessary mean that this will certainly happen also at West Lansburg. In fact, there might be several reasons not analysed in the argumentation, that might be responsible for the decrease. Maybe, some extreme athmosferic upheval have affected the area, and certainly this has nothing to do with the repeal of the status.
Moreover, even though a road might be built along the edge of wetlands, this does not necessarly involve the fact that the street will be travelled by people; besides, the road does not necessalry be covered with asphalt so that the healthy evirorment is not damaged. Thus, the construction might has not consequences on the lifes of the groundhog.
Nontheless, it might sounds quite extreme but, technically, the road might end up to save the lifes of those animals in case of pestilences or generaly, in case some unexpected events happen and the life of those animals is seriously compromised. In fact, thanks to the roead, it would be possible to help them.
In conclusion, in order to evaluate the veridicity of the argumentation effectively, it would be necessarly to have some information regarding the time in which the ancient records were written and the way those numbers were achieved. Moreover, it would be important to study deeper the circumstances in which the neighboring town of Carpenteria showed the decline in groundhog population. Finally, it is importnat to evaluate also whether the construction of the road might actually increrase the tourism and hence, somehow damage the biodiversity and t potential healthy envirorment for the animals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-14 | AtharvaT12 | 70 | view |
| 2024-11-14 | AtharvaT12 | 70 | view |
| 2024-11-14 | AtharvaT12 | 50 | view |
| 2024-08-10 | Bholuchand | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-26 | maddo4568 | view |
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 66
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 43
- n 58
Comments
e-rater score report
full essay topics wanted
==============
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 429 350
No. of Characters: 2117 1500
No. of Different Words: 196 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.551 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.935 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.832 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 150 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 117 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 75 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 58 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 28.6 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.301 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.933 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.353 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.601 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.079 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'appear'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: appear
...posed in support of the thesis does not appears to be cogent, weaking the quality of th...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'appear'
Suggestion: appear
...posed in support of the thesis does not appears to be cogent, weaking the quality of th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, finally, first, hence, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, so, thus, in conclusion, in fact, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.6327345309 117% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.9520958084 131% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 55.5748502994 113% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2196.0 2260.96107784 97% => OK
No of words: 429.0 441.139720559 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11888111888 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98198159533 2.78398813304 107% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 204.123752495 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477855477855 0.468620217663 102% => OK
syllable_count: 682.2 705.55239521 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.96107784431 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.22255489022 237% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.8473053892 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.9946125747 57.8364921388 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.4 119.503703932 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6 23.324526521 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 5.70786347227 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 5.15768463074 136% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.218282227539 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0743258471296 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0701772020484 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.128457276422 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0628817314937 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 14.3799401198 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.3550499002 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.197005988 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 12.5979740519 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.32208582834 108% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 98.500998004 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.1389221557 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.