Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
In general, the argument seems at first glance extremely flawed and it fails to evaluate additional considerations that could strongly and severly undermine the whole argumentation.
Firstly, one of the competences of a good government is to guarantee a common welfare for the highest possible number of its citizens. While it is true that a governmment should protect every single citizen, it is also true that an certain percentage of error will always be present in any science. Therefore, before asserting that it should not be possible to administer inoculations to everybody as a consequence that a small number of people would potentially die; a good government, together with a good national health carer ministree, should firsly carefully evaluate and analyse the magnitude of such side effects caused by inoclutaions. In particular, it would be considerably helping to know the proportion of death stricly caused by the inoculaitons, on the whole populaiton actually inoculated.
Secondly, it is important to keep in mind that vaccines bring all their benefits only once a certain size of the interested population got the injection. Unfortuanly, this brings to a moral hazard that pushes people to be favorable to a vaccination campaign but eventually not compulsory, suggesting that other people should get the dose but not them, so to avoid any eventual possible risk.
Thus, before stricly imposing a compulsory massime vaccination on a population, it would be important to deeply study the effectivenes of a certain vaccine. Clealry, if inoculaitons bring a protection rate from future viruses contraction which is below 50 or even 40 percent, it seems obvious that that vaccine is not ideal considering all the potential side effects it might cause.
Thirdly, to make the argument more cogent, it would be interesting to understand the anthropological and cultural conditions of the people living in the choosen area. In particular, it would be important to know how much those people are in contact with cowes, how the virus actually spreads around, and how many people have interractions with each others. Clearly, considering an immensly spread and desertic area, it is probably quite unlikely that inhabitants have much interraction one another; hence the spread of the virus would be drastically hindered.
In conclusion, the argument presents important flaws that make the whole argumentation inconsistent. However, some pieces of information concerning the proportion of side effects due to vaccination on the populaiton, the effectiveness rate of the vaccine, and the cultural attitudes of the population under consideration, could strongly strenghing the whole argumentation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-29 | dkim1206 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | wcfr | 60 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | riyarmy | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | Nowshin Tabassum | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Mizanur_Rahman | 55 | view |
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 66
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 43
- n 58
Comments
e-rater score report
out of topic
==========
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 22 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 419 350
No. of Characters: 2233 1500
No. of Different Words: 222 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.524 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.329 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.1 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 172 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 137 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 103 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 74 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 29.929 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.027 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 1 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.338 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.615 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.059 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ry single citizen, it is also true that an certain percentage of error will always...
^^
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...ions to everybody as a consequence that a small number of people would potentially die; a good go...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 541, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a good national health carer ministree, should firsly carefully evaluate and ana...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... whole populaiton actually inoculated. Secondly, it is important to keep in min...
^^^
Line 6, column 219, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'viruses'' or 'virus's'?
Suggestion: viruses'; virus's
...ons bring a protection rate from future viruses contraction which is below 50 or even 4...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, while, in conclusion, in general, in particular, it is true, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 28.8173652695 101% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 55.5748502994 103% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 16.3942115768 152% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2295.0 2260.96107784 102% => OK
No of words: 419.0 441.139720559 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47732696897 5.12650576532 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20387038739 2.78398813304 115% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 204.123752495 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54892601432 0.468620217663 117% => OK
syllable_count: 730.8 705.55239521 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.96107784431 181% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.22255489022 237% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.8473053892 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.0507013672 57.8364921388 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.928571429 119.503703932 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.9285714286 23.324526521 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2142857143 5.70786347227 232% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13248401588 0.218282227539 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406542981222 0.0743258471296 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366440779001 0.0701772020484 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0534908365552 0.128457276422 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441985619716 0.0628817314937 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 14.3799401198 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 48.3550499002 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.1628742515 181% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.197005988 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.1 12.5979740519 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.32208582834 116% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 98.500998004 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.1389221557 122% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.9071856287 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.