Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station's coverage of weather and local news. In addition, local businesses that used to advertise during our late-night news program have canceled their advertising contracts with us. Therefore, in order to attract more viewers to our news programs and to avoid losing any further advertising revenues, we should expand our coverage of weather and local news on all our news programs.
The author concludes that there is need to reschedule the time alotted to weather and local news to attract more viewers and stop declining the advertisement revenue. Since past one year, the television station is devoting more time to broadcast national news and much lesser time to weather and local news. The author 's line of reasoning is that the local business have cancelled the contract with us due to decrease in the number of viewers of the program. However, the author fails to provide any vital evidence on decline of viewers by national news program. This argument is not convincing for various reasons.
First of all, to attract more viewers to program, is based upon the assumption that restoring the time devoted to weather and local news will increase the consumption of the program. Moreover, complaints have been raised by the viewer concerning about the station's coverage of weather and local news. However, it is entirely possible that the complaint is not about the time devoted but can also be about the data of the information or the authenticity or the way which it is presented.Also, the author fails to provide enough evidence on why the viewers increase in late night shows by devoting more time to local and weather news.
Finally the author uses Future past flaw. It is something that happens in past would necessarily be true in future. The author claims that increasing time for weather and local news would increase the number of viewers of the program and avoid lossing advertisment contract. Yet the author does not provide any statistical data to prove his point.
In sum, the argument is defective mainly because the author feels that restoring the program station to what it was before a year, will improve the situation. Hence it does not support the conclusion that the viewers of the program increases and local bussinesses will continue to contract with station.To strengthen the argument, the author must, at very best, provide new ways in which the programs enhances the engagement of the viewers.
- Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet. They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects. What is specific to these online encyclopedias, 83
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society. 66
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 50
- People attend college or university for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge). Why do you think people attend college or university? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies a 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'stations'' or 'station's'?
Suggestion: stations'; station's
...ised by the viewer concerning about the stations coverage of weather and local news. How...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Also
...ticity or the way which it is presented.Also, the author fails to provide enough evi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...more time to local and weather news. Finally the author uses Future past flaw. It is...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ppens in past would necessarily be true in future. The author claims that increasing time...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ore a year, will improve the situation. Hence it does not support the conclusion that...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the viewers of the program increases and local bussinesses will continue to contr...
^^
Line 7, column 305, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
... will continue to contract with station.To strengthen the argument, the author mus...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, however, moreover, so, then, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 11.1786427146 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 28.8173652695 56% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 55.5748502994 94% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 16.3942115768 91% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 2260.96107784 76% => OK
No of words: 342.0 441.139720559 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99415204678 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.56307096286 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59409298653 2.78398813304 93% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 204.123752495 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461988304094 0.468620217663 99% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 705.55239521 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.3217742965 57.8364921388 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 119.503703932 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 23.324526521 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 5.70786347227 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 5.25449101796 133% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419268601887 0.218282227539 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157524118824 0.0743258471296 212% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12356979017 0.0701772020484 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26318103636 0.128457276422 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124206875258 0.0628817314937 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.3799401198 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.3550499002 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.5979740519 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 98.500998004 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.