Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They

Essay topics:

Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They believe it has many health-promoting nutrients, such as cartilage, which can heal our joints, and chondroitin, which promotes nerve regeneration. Skeptics point out that ingested cartilage can’t replenish cartilage in your knees or elbows and ingested chondroitin doesn’t make our brains any healthier. Yet, there is strong anecdotal evidence that people who consume bone broth have fewer metabolic and inflammatory diseases than those who don’t. Therefore, ancient humans knew something about our physiology that we don’t, and that by emulating the way they ate, we can cure many chronic illnesses.

While early hominids may have determined that paleo diets have a beneficial effect to curing chronic illnesses, the author's argument does not include scientific reasons of why ancient humans may not know something about humans' physiologies, metabolism, and curation of diseases. This argument does not include the recent technology, medicinal treatments, and food benefits that were made about curing chronic illnesses and our physiology.

Paleo diets may not have all of the nutrients we require to live and stay healthy. The author stated that there is strong evidence that people who consume bone broth have fever metabolic and inflmmatory diseases. However, people need a variety of the minerals and vitamins such as the fat-soluble and water-soluble vitamins for brain and bone regeneration. Some of these vitamins are not found in cartilage and bone broth, and can help nerve regeneration and overall improve health. These vitamins and minerals can help prevent metabolic and inflammatory diseases. Without consuming these, people's health and metabolism will degrade all together.

Additionally, the new technology that were invented recently definitely made a huge turnaround in the medical field. With the early hominids, they did not have these technologies to discover any malnutrient or chronic illnesses people can obtain. Technolologies such as epigenetics and bioinformatics help access our genetics and DNA to observe if there are mutations or anything genetics releated that can lead to unpreventable illnesses. For example, there is a specific gene in some people that is prone to a health deficiency. Advanced tehcnologies are a big factor of discovering something new about anatomy and physiology that the ancient humans did not.

Lastly, eating alone may not completely cure chronic illnesses. Medicinal treatments that have been discovered just recently have been helping people far more than just nutrients alone. Although nutrients do have a huge role, people who consume bone broth may also have chronic illnesses as well. The diet alone may not cure it completely, but medicine will have a bigger impact on someone due to its chemical effects and ways of working through the body faster and effective. Medicine may contain all of the nutrients that a human is lacking and has cured many chronic illnesses than just nutrients from food alone.

In conclusion, early hominds may claim that paleo diets regenerate bones and brains, ultamately curing many chornic illnesses, but that does not mean that it has a big impact on curing these chronic illnesses. They may increasingly cure and prevent these illnesses, but not completely cure the illnesses. Other vitamins that are not included in the diet, advanced technology, and medicinal treatments have all strong factors that contribute to curing chronic illnesses and discovering more aspects about human physiology.

Votes
Average: 4.9 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-29 jason123 69 view
2020-01-25 Chayank_11 57 view
2020-01-07 hyunjulia99 75 view
2019-12-29 neha1980 50 view
2019-12-13 noitsimani 61 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...effect to curing chronic illnesses, the authors argument does not include scientific re...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ysiology. Paleo diets may not have all of the nutrients we require to live and stay h...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 58, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'living'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: living
...ot have all of the nutrients we require to live and stay healthy. The author stated tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 499, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ter and effective. Medicine may contain all of the nutrients that a human is lacking and h...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, lastly, may, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 11.1786427146 259% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 17.0 13.6137724551 125% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 28.8173652695 104% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 55.5748502994 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2462.0 2260.96107784 109% => OK
No of words: 448.0 441.139720559 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49553571429 5.12650576532 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84435965656 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 204.123752495 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477678571429 0.468620217663 102% => OK
syllable_count: 780.3 705.55239521 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.67365269461 418% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1924747619 57.8364921388 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.238095238 119.503703932 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 23.324526521 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2380952381 5.70786347227 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143046435823 0.218282227539 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479426145966 0.0743258471296 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0280125321533 0.0701772020484 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0847422591493 0.128457276422 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015409090527 0.0628817314937 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.3799401198 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.3550499002 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.5979740519 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 98.500998004 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 12.3882235529 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 448 350
No. of Characters: 2399 1500
No. of Different Words: 209 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.601 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.355 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.75 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 180 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 147 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 107 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 71 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.333 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.918 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.524 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.328 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.546 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.096 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5