Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
As a team, a leader respecting his or her peers is more crucial than making moral judgment for the team. A leader needs to maintain the respect of his or her peers because they can work together to form good decisions and there will be less of a chance for the leader to gain respect for himself or herself.
A leader's respect for his members is crucial in regarding to forming good decisions with each other. With respect, the members will be more comfortable and respect the leader themselves. If the leader and the members respect each other, they can create decisions such as making decisions for the team without causing any tension or apprehension within them. Also, there is less of a chance for the leader to be well-liked. If the leader had no respect, the chance of him becoming disliked is increased since the leader can feel like he or she has power to control them, making the peers feel anxious, angry, or belittled. The team can also have poor relationships with the leader since the leader has no respect for them.
Although respect is crucial, sound moral judgment can also be just as important. Sound moral judgment can enable the leader to make the right decisions for themselves and for others. The leader can discuss about what is right and wrong with the members to make them feel safe and morally correct.
In conclusion, the leader's ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers are greater than sound moral judgment. Without respect, the leader and members will have bad relationships with each other, making the team not blossom, leading to disband.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | arpit6798 | 79 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
- Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They 49
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 20, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...orally correct. In conclusion, the leaders ability to maintain the respect of his ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, well, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 11.3162921348 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 58.6224719101 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 2235.4752809 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 276.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79710144928 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41486798327 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 215.323595506 54% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.420289855072 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 381.6 704.065955056 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.017606904 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.846153846 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07692307692 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287950457312 0.243740707755 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151239033458 0.0831039109588 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838976461869 0.0758088955206 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23293634101 0.150359130593 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455073308867 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 100.480337079 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.