A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled food and determined that all chemicals found in the food were chemicals that are approved for use in pet food. Thus, the recalled food was not responsible for these symptoms, and the company should not devote further resources to the investigation.
The argument states that as a result of profused complaints from the customers using one particular product to feed their pets, that particular company recalled an aggregate of 4 million pounds of stock for testing. And found no chemical which would be harmful to any pet. This is not at all an ingenious act, this is definitely a suspectable conclusion considering the reasoning provided to it. There will be a myriad chances possible, as many pets consuming this particular product are being physically tormented.
The argument doesn't provide many details such as are those pets belong to the same locality or organization, or what the chances that there might be a pet flu got viral out there, or it also doesn't provide whether has anything in common with their physicality, such as breed, type of food it consumes, etc. Considering one of the possibilities is that the pets, anguished from different sorts of illnesses are from different regions, the basic check of chemicals used may not be sufficient. Because all tests either fassai or any other food organizations do are based on the previous data. For example, as any food corporation knows that dogs show allergic reactions to an excessive amount of unsaturated sugars, so they test for the number of unsaturated sugars used in that particular product. Here, as pets from different regions got affected by physical illnesses, they need to start their testing from the pets and then come to a conclusion on what specific type of material is causing this kind of allergic abstainments in those pets. And then test for that particular type of material in the pet food.
If there is any chance of a pet flu outbreak in wider regions of the organization, the organization responsible for pet healthcare must be taking action on the basis of raising complaints observed in any form of media or social media groups. Then the cure might as well be decided by that responsible healthcare group of people. If the data is a little more explicit considering more data and scenarios then the solution will be abridging the implicit nature.
In sum, I not only find both the argument and reasoning a bit artful but also given the probability of many possibilities, I absolutely urge for any more specific data to be provided to take any action or come to any conclusion. Until then declaring that the pet food production company's absolvement is unacceptable and it shows a perfect ineptness with regards to rudimentary knowledge of consequences visualized. And as many say the accused remain guilty until proven in the presence of any responsible court system
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-07 | Aaishani De | 58 | view |
| 2022-09-30 | Mufaddal Rangwala | 58 | view |
| 2022-07-21 | gewkimrtnabovwtejo | 23 | view |
| 2022-07-20 | gewkimrtnabovwtejo | 58 | view |
| 2022-06-22 | Nalu00 | 83 | view |
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting lethargy and other signs of illness After the recall the pet food company tested samples from the recalled food an 83
- The following is a letter from the parent of a private school student to the principal of that school Last year Kensington Academy turned over management of its cafeteria to a private vendor Swift Nutrition This company serves low fat low calorie meals th 43
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military 75
- A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer 66
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 62
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... physically tormented. The argument doesnt provide many details such as are those ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...pet flu got viral out there, or it also doesnt provide whether has anything in common ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, well, for example, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 11.1786427146 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 28.8173652695 90% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 55.5748502994 104% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2177.0 2260.96107784 96% => OK
No of words: 438.0 441.139720559 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9703196347 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88579146387 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 204.123752495 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511415525114 0.468620217663 109% => OK
syllable_count: 698.4 705.55239521 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.70958083832 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.67365269461 299% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.8473053892 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.5408264123 57.8364921388 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0625 119.503703932 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.375 23.324526521 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.70786347227 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276233350103 0.218282227539 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930670548673 0.0743258471296 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753849848521 0.0701772020484 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151417680771 0.128457276422 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686546991394 0.0628817314937 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.3799401198 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.3550499002 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.197005988 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.32208582834 108% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 98.500998004 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.1389221557 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... physically tormented. The argument doesnt provide many details such as are those ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...pet flu got viral out there, or it also doesnt provide whether has anything in common ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, well, for example, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 11.1786427146 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 28.8173652695 90% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 55.5748502994 104% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2177.0 2260.96107784 96% => OK
No of words: 438.0 441.139720559 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9703196347 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88579146387 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 204.123752495 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511415525114 0.468620217663 109% => OK
syllable_count: 698.4 705.55239521 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.70958083832 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.67365269461 299% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.8473053892 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.5408264123 57.8364921388 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0625 119.503703932 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.375 23.324526521 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.70786347227 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276233350103 0.218282227539 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930670548673 0.0743258471296 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753849848521 0.0701772020484 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151417680771 0.128457276422 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686546991394 0.0628817314937 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.3799401198 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.3550499002 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.197005988 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.32208582834 108% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 98.500998004 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.1389221557 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.