Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.
Here, the speaker claims two perspectives that could turn the people in the society moral. Few people believe that making children learn morality should be the foundation of education, while others believe that teaching foundation of logical reasoning would help more in the direction of pursuing the deed. On the basis of a few morality-based theories, method morality is preferred in many the developed and developing countries, because that particular theory allows people to decide morals or ethics for themselves. As many intellectual people said, always relish your freedom, and it knows the path of ideality better than restrainment.
Consider the first possibility, in case the foundation of the education is given by making students learn morality, all society takes no longer time to convert as a banal swamp in which every human is behaving as the every other. The development of anything in any organization or society happens by having a myriad of perspectives on every issue they face. If the world runs uphold to the thought of those few whomsoever suggesting teaching morality as a foundation. For example, consider an area called Charminar, a part of the Hyderabad district in Telangana, where almost all people live on the same moral principles. That flock always wanted a particular political party, MIM, to win in their constituency so that the majority population in that area, the Muslims, will be relishing the partisan by the local governance. This was known as their bigger mistake until another political party fought and won against MIM, which resulted as a phase-changing point in that organization.
Giving nuance to think is the biggest boon, as it may result in wonderful concepts to sustain or develop any organization or society. One of the theories in ethics and morality is method morality, and it is based on individual perspective, every human would be logically, socially, and mentally strong to set their ethics and must follow them to reach their goals. In that way, the world will always be fond of development. The theory depicted in this para is supported by other few people, by teaching logical reasoning as the foundation of education. As logical reasoning mostly depends on the perseverance of an individual, the moral principle set by every other will be unique and that eccentric behavior helps in the advancement of society.
In sum, I undeniably concede with method morality theory which allows freedom to take a decision on their own, on the other hand, if one follows the moral principles set by any professor they will recede to pay the price for their own decisions. It's better to teach rudimentary logical reasoning to the children as a foundation of their education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 70 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | RIYA MODI | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-02 | jayatyagi123@yahoo.co.in | 50 | view |
| 2023-04-07 | Aaishani De | 66 | view |
| 2022-11-21 | raghavchauhan619 | 62 | view |
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e mail correspondence Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity as well as protect the company from lawsuits 75
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal rec 53
- A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer 66
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military 75
- Mass media and the internet have caused people s attention spans to get shorter However the overall effect has been positive while people are less able to focus on one thing they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through large quan 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2287.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 446.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12780269058 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87889320772 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513452914798 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 730.8 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8628992696 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.529411765 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2352941176 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35294117647 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380735976316 0.243740707755 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116710808868 0.0831039109588 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129315651983 0.0758088955206 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238468784605 0.150359130593 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115871965946 0.0667264976115 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.