The president of Grove College has recommended that the college abandon its century-old tradition of all-female education and begin admitting men. Pointing to other all-female colleges that experienced an increase in applications after adopting coeducation, the president argues that coeducation would lead to a significant increase in applications and enrollment. However, the director of the alumnae association opposes the plan. Arguing that all-female education is essential to the very identity of the college, the director cites annual surveys of incoming students in which these students say that the school's all-female status was the primary reason they selected Grove. The director also points to a survey of Grove alumnae in which a majority of respondents strongly favored keeping the college all female.
The presidents of Grove College suggest that college, unlike its old tradition, must admit men to study there because coeducation increases the college’s enrollments. Nevertheless, the director of the alumnae disagree with this plan because he think the main factor of this college is full-female. In addition, two surveys show that all incoming students and most alumnae disagree with this plan. Scrutiny each of these factors, however, reveals that none of them lend credible supports to the recommendation.
First, base on the fact that coeducation was a successful in other all-female colleges, the president infers that it can be useful in this college. Nonetheless, he ignore that it is entirely possible most students choose this college because the college all female, so coeducation can cause them to change their decision. In addition, this suggestion can lead students to leave college. Without considering this scenario, the faculty members cannot justifiably conclude that coeducation increase the students of the college.
Second, the director claims that students select this college for study only because it is full female. However, it is entirely possible the college offers high funds, so many students select here for study. In addition, the college may hired high educated teachers, which have a apparent role on attract students. In short, if the director of the alumnae ignores all effective factors in this matter, I can not take the director’s idea seriously.
In the third place, a serious of problems with the director’s claim arises with the scant statistical information on which it stands. The director of the alumnae claim that most incoming student select this college because it is full female, while all these students are female. Hence, a survey’s respondents cannot be representative of overall population of students. Moreover, the number of alumnae who took part in the survey my was too low to ensure that majority of alumnae disagree with coeducation.
In sum, the argument is logically flawed and therefore unconvincing. To strengthen the argument, the director of the alumnae most provide statistical information that the survey’ reflects of the general population. In order to evaluate the recommend, we need to know about all possible causes that student like to study in Grove College.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-20 | extragpu99 | 58 | view |
| 2022-12-19 | cbol | 59 | view |
- Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species, despite the expense to humans in effort, time, and financial well-being. Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in mon 58
- The president of Grove College has recommended that the college abandon its century-old tradition of all-female education and begin admitting men. Pointing to other all-female colleges that experienced an increase in applications after adopting coeducatio 35
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. 66
- When famous people such as actors, athletes and rock stars give their opinions, many people listen. Do you think we should pay attention to these opinions? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 75
- Collectors prize the ancient life-size clay statues of human figures made on Kali Island but have long wondered how Kalinese artists were able to depict bodies with such realistic precision. Since archaeologists have recently discovered molds of human hea 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'thinks'.
Suggestion: thinks
...mnae disagree with this plan because he think the main factor of this college is full...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'ignores'.
Suggestion: ignores
...useful in this college. Nonetheless, he ignore that it is entirely possible most stude...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ired high educated teachers, which have a apparent role on attract students. In s...
^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... the director's idea seriously. In the third place, a serious of problems ...
^^
Line 9, column 242, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...eneral population. In order to evaluate the recommend, we need to know about all possible cau...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'nonetheless', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'third', 'while', 'as to', 'in addition', 'in fact', 'in short', 'in the third place']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.263279445727 0.25644967241 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.110854503464 0.15541462614 71% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0969976905312 0.0836205057962 116% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0438799076212 0.0520304965353 84% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0346420323326 0.0272364105082 127% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.136258660508 0.125424944231 109% => OK
Participles: 0.00692840646651 0.0416121511921 17% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.96698091401 2.79052419416 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0207852193995 0.026700313972 78% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.124711316397 0.113004496875 110% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0184757505774 0.0255425247493 72% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00923787528868 0.0127820249294 72% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2367.0 2731.13054187 87% => OK
No of words: 367.0 446.07635468 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.44959128065 6.12365571057 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.57801047555 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.435967302452 0.378187486979 115% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.365122615804 0.287650121315 127% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.25068119891 0.208842608468 120% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.136239782016 0.135150697306 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96698091401 2.79052419416 106% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 207.018472906 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509536784741 0.469332199767 109% => OK
Word variations: 54.6208527877 52.1807786196 105% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.039408867 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.3157894737 23.2022227129 83% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5322725955 57.7814097925 51% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.578947368 141.986410481 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3157894737 23.2022227129 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.724660767414 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.58251231527 140% => OK
Readability: 55.8280510541 51.9672348444 107% => OK
Elegance: 2.14634146341 1.8405768891 117% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436528224463 0.441005458295 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.139656760863 0.135418324435 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.078927056089 0.0829849096947 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.574303232008 0.58762219726 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.106880162941 0.147661913831 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185880086591 0.193483328276 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785925047166 0.0970749176394 81% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.474633243648 0.42659136922 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0161057149242 0.0774707102158 21% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.319320183345 0.312017818177 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572425101181 0.0698173142475 82% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.33743842365 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.87684729064 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.82512315271 83% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 6.46551724138 93% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 5.36822660099 130% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.82389162562 106% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 14.657635468 109% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.