A recent study shows that people living on the continent of North America suffer 9 times more chronic fatigue and 31 times more chronic depression than do people living on the continent of Asia. Interestingly, Asians, on average, eat 20 grams of soy per day, whereas North Americans eat virtually none. It turns out that soy contains phytochemicals called Isoflavones, which have been found to possess disease-preventing properties. Thus, North Americans should consider eating soy on a regular basis as a way of preventing fatigue and depression.
Argument primarily lack of evidences which prove soy as disease-preventing properties. Soy contains phytochemicals which is called Isoflavones, there is no supported argument that best describes it as immune to disease. Further, no matter how disease-preventing properties soy may contain, it can not be derived that soy is also useful in case of depression and fatigue.
More investigation is required in order to find root cause of fatigue and depression. There may many other factors involved to cause such mental diseases. Weather is one of the most influential cause in such cases. Argument does not describe any information about weather and it simply looks ignored. North America and Asian countries definitively have different weather. Cold weather is prominent in North America while that of hot summer in Asia. Without considering such important factor in deriving conclusion is not sagacious decision. It may be the case that such diseases like fatigue and depression are root cause of cold weather that is mostly absent in Asian countries during major period of the year. If so, soy consumption may be proved surely irrelevant to given diseases.
Work culture and routine life of North America and Asian countries are also differs considerably with each other. In examining given arguments, such major factors can not be undermined. Environment in which people used to work is major part of anyone's life and plays a significant role in developing such normal diseases. Scientifically depression is mostly concerned as mental diseases and caused by living excessively tensed life. And fatigue is also physical exhausted situation which can be resulted again by excessively labor work.
It can be stated that soy may or may not play any role in developing or mitigating such diseases and argument clearly lacks providing such evidence. Argument can be formed stronger by analyzing and examining case study further in the direction of considering all major factors mentioned in above paragraphs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-17 | NSona | 60 | view |
| 2020-08-28 | Shreyan36 | 53 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | ko_tik | 55 | view |
| 2019-09-11 | vijaykaushik132 | 63 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | Shahrear59 | 40 | view |
- Governments should hire accomplished filmmakers to create films that deliver important public messages 58
- The way students and scholars interpret the materials they work with in their academic fields is more a matter of personality than of training Different interpretations come about when people with different personalities look at exactly the same objects f 58
- Laws should not be rigid or fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. 50
- School policies should be based as much on what employers want as well as what students and teachers want 57
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 66
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 316 350
No. of Characters: 1663 1500
No. of Different Words: 168 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.216 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.263 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.977 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 122 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 99 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 73 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 51 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.632 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.2 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.421 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.304 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.496 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.077 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, may, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 11.1786427146 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 28.8173652695 38% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 55.5748502994 70% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 2260.96107784 75% => OK
No of words: 316.0 441.139720559 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37341772152 5.12650576532 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03275527377 2.78398813304 109% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 204.123752495 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528481012658 0.468620217663 113% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 705.55239521 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.76447105788 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8031616807 57.8364921388 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.3684210526 119.503703932 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6315789474 23.324526521 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.57894736842 5.70786347227 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0909509935962 0.218282227539 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0315971139543 0.0743258471296 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0275818582185 0.0701772020484 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0539781758336 0.128457276422 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198403458887 0.0628817314937 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.3799401198 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.5979740519 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.32208582834 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 98.500998004 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 12.3882235529 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.