Some health experts anticipate a reduction in the number of headaches among dwellers of Mentia thanks to the salutary effect of salicylate, which is contained in food and is planned to be added in even greater amounts. They have come to this prediction based on the study that had shown a correlation between increasing commercial use of salicylate and a permanently declining number of headaches reported by test subjects. However, the conclusion drawn by the experts, as it currently stands, rests on several unwarranted assumptions that render it invalid. Thus, the following three questions must be addressed.
First of all, what was the scope of the study? It is possible that the study has been conducted on only a few people; the reaction of the human body to salicylate may vary depending on one’s age, weight, or health status. For example, if the study group consisted of several test subjects from one age group, the results of such a study not always can be applied to other age groups. In other words, the organism of children may react to this chemical in a completely different way than that of aged people. If this is the case, then those who conducted the study should expand its scale, taking into account all of the categories of people. Doing so could significantly increase the credibility of the argument and provide more substantial evidence that this drug affects different people in the same way.
Secondly, if someone abused the consumption of salicylate, what side effects would occur? Probably the test subjects were under the supervision and were not allowed to overuse this chemical. However, when salicylate is added to foods in large quantities, and people start to consume such foods excessively, the outcome may be unpredictable. Further, in such cases, this chemical may appear to be noxious, exacerbating the headache instead of ameliorating the pain. If the above scenario proves true, then the author's conclusion that thanks to salicylate residents of Mentia will suffer fewer headaches in the future does not hold water.
Finally, would dwellers of Mentia afford foods with salicylate if the price of them were high? There is the possibility that foods that contain this chemical may be costly, and the majority of residents of Mentia could not buy them. Consequently, the amounts spent on the production of such food may not justify itself, and production may stop. If so, the number of reported headaches could not be decreased because people would not consume salicylate, and the conclusion drawn by the author is greatly weakened.
To conclude, while the experts may have come to a sound conclusion regarding the reduction of the number of headaches among the residents of Milenia, more data is needed before a firm conclusion is reached. If the author answers the above three questions, it will be possible to fully evaluate the validity of the argument.
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 100
- A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise Currently the nearest jazz club is 65 miles away thus the proposed new jazz club in Monroe the C Note would have the local market all to itself Plus jazz is extremely popular in Mon 100
- Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia Using an observation centered approach to studying Tertian culture he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by the 59
- A recently issued twenty year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin a medicine used to treat headaches Al 83
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 551, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'invalids'?
Suggestion: invalids
... unwarranted assumptions that render it invalid. Thus, the following three questions mu...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 609, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...d expand its scale, taking into account all of the categories of people. Doing so could si...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 509, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...he above scenario proves true, then the authors conclusion that thanks to salicylate re...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, first of all, in other words, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.6327345309 112% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.9520958084 147% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 28.8173652695 87% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 55.5748502994 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2428.0 2260.96107784 107% => OK
No of words: 479.0 441.139720559 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06889352818 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.56307096286 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75131231389 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 204.123752495 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507306889353 0.468620217663 108% => OK
syllable_count: 761.4 705.55239521 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 2.70958083832 332% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.67365269461 299% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2837363746 57.8364921388 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.619047619 119.503703932 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8095238095 23.324526521 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.80952380952 5.70786347227 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197994348484 0.218282227539 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055789894525 0.0743258471296 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466133955667 0.0701772020484 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112600815824 0.128457276422 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347043588627 0.0628817314937 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.3799401198 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.3550499002 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 98.500998004 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 551, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'invalids'?
Suggestion: invalids
... unwarranted assumptions that render it invalid. Thus, the following three questions mu...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 609, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...d expand its scale, taking into account all of the categories of people. Doing so could si...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 509, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...he above scenario proves true, then the authors conclusion that thanks to salicylate re...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, first of all, in other words, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.6327345309 112% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.9520958084 147% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 28.8173652695 87% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 55.5748502994 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2428.0 2260.96107784 107% => OK
No of words: 479.0 441.139720559 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06889352818 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.56307096286 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75131231389 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 204.123752495 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507306889353 0.468620217663 108% => OK
syllable_count: 761.4 705.55239521 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 2.70958083832 332% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.67365269461 299% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2837363746 57.8364921388 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.619047619 119.503703932 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8095238095 23.324526521 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.80952380952 5.70786347227 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197994348484 0.218282227539 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055789894525 0.0743258471296 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466133955667 0.0701772020484 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112600815824 0.128457276422 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347043588627 0.0628817314937 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.3799401198 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.3550499002 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 98.500998004 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.