Traffic Problem

Essay topics:

Traffic Problem

The author of the letter concludes that in order to solve the problem of traffic during rush hours, a bicycle lane rather than another vehicle lane should be added to Blue Highway. The arguer cites the increase in traffic hours on Green highway even after a lane was added to the road. In addition, the claim is based on the evidence that residents of the area love using bicycles. It is easy to think that the residents will use bikes cause they habitually use them, however more evidence is needed to prove this claim. The argument rests of unjustified assumptions that Bicycles will definitely reduce the traffic problem, the workers will cycle to work, therefore unless more evidence is provided to justify the claims, the argument remains unpersuasive.

The arguer suggests the use of bicycles as a remedy to the traffic conundrum. True, bicycles are a convenient mode of transport. Rarely do bicycles cause traffic. To back the claim, the author provides evidence that the residents are keen on bicycles. yet, we do not know how exactly the bicycles are used. Bicycles have many purposes. They are sometimes used for leisure, for sports, as a tool for exercising and as a method of transport. Data is not provided on what exactly the residents use the bicycles for. The argument can be strengthen by showing statistics that show that the residents mainly use bicycles as a mode of transport. Inversely, if statistics are to show people cycle mainly for leisure, the assumptions on which the argument rests will be invalidated. In order to set the argument on a more sound footing, the author must provide evidence , in form of statistics showing that indeed the residents use bicycles primarily as a mode of transport and there are likely to use it to travel to work.

Secondly, the argument rests of the assumption that a Bicycle and not an extra car lane is needed. In validating the argument, the arguer cites the extension of green way lane and argues that the problem was not solved. However, the cause or the factors surrounding the situation are not known. traffic is caused by many factors. These may include an increase in the number of cars, bad driving habits by drivers. Therefore, It could be that the number of cars increased with the expansion of the road. it is possible that the situation could be different along blue high way. No evidence is also provided that bicycles will not cause traffic jams. With an introduction on a bicycle lane, a large number of people may buy cycles and cause congestion too. In addition to that, places of work can be too far away meaning that peopler will still use roads instead of cycling for a large distance. In order to validate the claims, the arguer must demonstrate that the distance from the residency to the site of work is within a cycling distance.

In conclusion, the arguments rests on the assumption that bicycles will definitely solve the traffic problem, and that a cycle lane and not an extra car lane is needed. In order to strengthen the arguments, the author must provide stats to prove that residents will use bicycles as a mode of transport to work

Votes
Average: 6 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-04-20 Andrewbanda70 60 view
2020-11-12 lxj595 59 view
2014-10-13 venous 80 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Yet
...hat the residents are keen on bicycles. yet, we do not know how exactly the bicycle...
^^^
Line 3, column 861, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ooting, the author must provide evidence , in form of statistics showing that inde...
^^
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... argument rests of the assumption that a Bicycle and not an extra car lane is nee...
^^
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Traffic
...urrounding the situation are not known. traffic is caused by many factors. These may in...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the number of cars, bad driving habits by drivers. Therefore, It could be that ...
^^
Line 5, column 506, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...creased with the expansion of the road. it is possible that the situation could be...
^^
Line 5, column 693, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...With an introduction on a bicycle lane, a large number of people may buy cycles and cause congest...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...f work is within a cycling distance. In conclusion, the arguments rests on the ...
^^
Line 7, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e arguments rests on the assumption that bicycles will definitely solve the traff...
^^
Line 7, column 171, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ne and not an extra car lane is needed. In order to strengthen the arguments, the ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, in addition, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.6327345309 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.9520958084 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 13.6137724551 147% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 28.8173652695 101% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 55.5748502994 122% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 16.3942115768 146% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2595.0 2260.96107784 115% => OK
No of words: 541.0 441.139720559 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7966728281 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82280071112 4.56307096286 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57766510146 2.78398813304 93% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 204.123752495 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.408502772643 0.468620217663 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 828.9 705.55239521 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 19.0 8.76447105788 217% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.22255489022 237% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 19.7664670659 147% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.3889460162 57.8364921388 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4827586207 119.503703932 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6551724138 23.324526521 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.31034482759 5.70786347227 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 5.25449101796 190% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 6.88822355289 203% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.67664670659 192% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164712827501 0.218282227539 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550495281031 0.0743258471296 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852254674055 0.0701772020484 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136447232376 0.128457276422 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655012488599 0.0628817314937 104% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.3799401198 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.3550499002 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.197005988 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.5979740519 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.32208582834 89% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 98.500998004 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 5 2
No. of Sentences: 26 15
No. of Words: 541 350
No. of Characters: 2529 1500
No. of Different Words: 208 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.823 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.675 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.489 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 177 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 137 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 94 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 51 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.808 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.858 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.462 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.31 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.449 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.107 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5