W
The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News:
"The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal Wetlands of West Lansburg. Ancient records suggest that the tutted groundhog once numbered in the millions. Since they were declared a wildlife sanctuary in 2004, development along the coastal wetlandé has been prohibited. Now .local development interests are lobbying for the West Lansburg council to allow an access road to be built along the edge of wetlands. Neighboring Eastern Carpehteria, which had a similar ' sanctuary, has seen its sea otter population decline since the repeal of its sanctuary status in 1978. In order to preserve the region's
biodiversity and ensure a healthy environment, the West Lansburg council should not allow the road to be built."
The following argument is flawed due to number of reasons. primarily the argument is based on unwarranted assumption that the West Lansburg and neighboring Eastern carpenteria are same, rendering conclusion, that the West Lansburg will follow decline in population as Eastern Carpenteria
after devlopent of road.
The argument fails to provide any justification that the two sancturies are similar for one, the decline in population of sea otter may be contributed by some other factor and not because it's santury status has been retracted.had the argument provided the information regading how two santuries are similar, even than the argument would have to further prove that how construction of road is similar to retraction of sanctuary status.
The argument also leaves many unanswered questions. Even if the two sancturies are similar, the devlopment of road along west lansburg sanctuary does not mean it sanctuary status would be retracted and it may be possible that the devlopement of road will bring more tourists to sanctuary which in turn will help the sanctuary to burgeon.
finally, the argument claims that what held true in 1978 will hold true today.
Because the argument makes sevral unwarranted assumptions, it fails to make convencing case that in order to preserve the biodiversity and ensure healthy environment of Langsburg sanctuary
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-19 | viveksaroj1997 | 42 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | sikrewalrohit96@gmail.com | 33 | view |
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. “According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in 43
- Techno corporation is our top pick for the investment this term. We urge all our clients to invest in this new company. For the first time in ten years, a company that has developed a stellite technology has been approvd by the FTA to compete with current 59
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things. 50
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military. 50
- The following is a letter from the parent of a private school student to the principal of that school:Last year, Kensington Academy turned over management of its cafeteria to a private vendor, Swift Nutrition. This company serves low-fat, low-calorie meal 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Primarily
...ent is flawed due to number of reasons. primarily the argument is based on unwarranted as...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
...rn will help the sanctuary to burgeon. finally, the argument claims that what held tru...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...diversity and ensure healthy environment of Langsburg sanctuary
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, may, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.6327345309 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 28.8173652695 38% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 55.5748502994 45% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 18.0 16.3942115768 110% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1151.0 2260.96107784 51% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 213.0 441.139720559 48% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40375586854 5.12650576532 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.56307096286 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92863684189 2.78398813304 105% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 204.123752495 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56338028169 0.468620217663 120% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 705.55239521 50% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 19.7664670659 35% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.8473053892 131% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 131.960723903 57.8364921388 228% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 164.428571429 119.503703932 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4285714286 23.324526521 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.70786347227 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0821045104884 0.218282227539 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421730682558 0.0743258471296 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545910819842 0.0701772020484 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0393181490243 0.128457276422 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642475978904 0.0628817314937 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 14.3799401198 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 48.3550499002 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.197005988 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.5979740519 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.32208582834 113% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 98.500998004 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 12.3882235529 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.1389221557 126% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.9071856287 168% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.