X
X
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-07-10 | Brindajuneja_ | 16 | view |
2024-07-10 | Brindajuneja_ | 16 | view |
2024-07-10 | Brindajuneja_ | 66 | view |
2023-09-20 | awojinrin | 83 | view |
2023-09-10 | Vivi5428 | 57 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: Such an increase in usage could in turn require more maintainence which would need to be financed by a larger budget.
Error: maintainence Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: However, in the author's current argument these assumptions are insubstantiated.
Error: insubstantiated Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: He or she provides no evidence that the current budget is insufficient for the maintainence of riverside recreational facilities nor that residents avoid the Mason River for the sole reason of its uncleanliness.
Error: uncleanliness Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: maintainence Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: Until these assumptions are addressed, the author's argument remains insuffiently supported and the recommendation unfounded.
Error: insuffiently Suggestion: No alternate word
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 533 350
No. of Characters: 2746 1500
No. of Different Words: 197 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.805 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.152 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.894 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 188 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 147 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 107 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 78 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.65 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.178 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.65 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.391 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.591 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.178 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 427, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... river for these purposes. However, the authors argument and final recommendation rely ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... not provide sufficient grounds for the authors assumption. If the maintainence which t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 653, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...hen there would be no reason follow the authors recommendation of increasing the budget...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 760, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...s on the Mason River. In this case, the authors recommendation of increasing the budget...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 336, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...il these assumptions are addressed, the authors argument remains insuffiently supported...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, may, similarly, so, still, then, thus, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 28.8173652695 118% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 55.5748502994 95% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 16.3942115768 110% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2794.0 2260.96107784 124% => OK
No of words: 533.0 441.139720559 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24202626642 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80487177365 4.56307096286 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9587164695 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 204.123752495 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.378986866792 0.468620217663 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 876.6 705.55239521 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 2.70958083832 332% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.8473053892 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9606106341 57.8364921388 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.7 119.503703932 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.65 23.324526521 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85 5.70786347227 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297922764182 0.218282227539 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1209159034 0.0743258471296 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0981908337884 0.0701772020484 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195129242385 0.128457276422 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113855900342 0.0628817314937 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 14.3799401198 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.3550499002 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.197005988 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.5979740519 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.32208582834 95% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 98.500998004 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 12.3882235529 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.1389221557 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.