The best test of an argument is the argument's ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Argument by its definition means statement or proof given in support to justify the position taken. Which means any argument will have a basis of discussion to prove the point correct. However just providing justification is not enough. The argument will be regarded as valid in true sense if it has the ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint. Of course that someone should be a rational human being because irrational person will never give up to any argument no matter how valid it is.
All arguments by in nature will have a logic based on which a discussion takes place. And in the process encounters many counter arguments and needs to be dealt as and when encountered. People with the opposing view point will have the most difficult counter arguments to invalidate the argument. The simple reason is to prove their point valid. And so the amount of effort and expertise will even more. Any weak links in the argument, however small or big it may be, will be challenged. They might even bring up absolutely new aspects of the argument which have not been thought of earlier. And dealing with such people becomes very important.
The real success of an argument is truly felt when someone with opposing viewpoint is convinced. Furthermore not all arguments even with strong rational points are completely accepted by the opposing party, however if the argument is strong enough to make them re-think the entire issue with a new perspective, or may be part of it, then it is good enough. However the opposing party will have to rational because someone with an irrational way of thinking will never be able to appreciate the rational part of the discussion.
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you 64
- In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should be required to step down after five years.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and s 91
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position 90
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 75
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the m 83
Sentence: All arguments by in nature will have a logic based on which a discussion takes place.
Description: The tag a preposition is not usually followed by in
Suggestion: Refer to by and in
flaws:
No. of Words: 287 350
No. of Characters: 1368 1500
No. of Different Words: 150 200
Number of Paragraphs: 3 5
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 287 350
No. of Characters: 1368 1500
No. of Different Words: 150 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.116 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.767 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.521 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 93 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 75 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 52 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 28 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.938 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.968 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.438 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.321 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.459 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.063 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 5