Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop

Science and developments flourish where they are supported and researches are conducted with freedom. As one can observe from the history, societies live their best periods in an environment that promotes free-thinking. Improvements in science can be achieved if it is not restricted by the government. In addition, development of science would enable the society to reach a better level. In the following paragraphs, the reasons for governments should not restrict the science will be discussed.

To begin with, there might be situations when governments should limit the scope of scientific applications and researches. The researches that might harm human dignity or aim to produce chemical weapons should be banned. For example, developments in genetically engineering reached to a position where it is possible to clone a human. Even though these new technologies are amazing, they might produce serious consequences. People might desire to use them for harvesting the organs of clones. This aim is not parallel with human rights then it should not be permitted. Moreover, chemical weapons might have disastrous effects as in the case of Hiroshima. As a result, any form of usage and development of weapons that might affect such a large population should be banned.

In addition, although there might be some restrictions as stated above, they should be few. The countries where there are only few restrictions on science might attract the researchers. As a result these countries would enjoy the economic benefits of these researches. Researchers and scientists are most likely to prefer where they are supported and free to focus on whatever they find interesting and promising. For example, there are severe restrictions on genetic researches in United States and many European countries. Beside, Singapore does not ban any research and they create a supporting environment for the researchers. Consequently, several eminent professors and many promising young scientists who specialize on genetic choose to dwell on Singapore. They conduct important researches on stem cell. Hence, any revenue that might be generated as a result of developments in these areas would be harvested by Singapore. Hence, allowing to scientific researches would increase the revenue and prestige of governments.

Finally, governments might prefer to restrict scientific researches under the name of showing respect to religious feelings of the populace. However, the aims of religious people is most likely to protect their authority and do not allow people to enlighten. For example, in Middle Ages Roman Catholic Church put many restrictions on scientific researches. They did not permit any research that might contradict with the doctrines of Bible. For instance, Galileo claimed that the Earth revolves around the Sun. Even though thinking in the opposite way is impossible today, the Catholic Church disclaimed the assertion and they conducted a trial to punish Galileo and pushed him to agree with the premises in the Bible. As in the case of the example, if these restrictions had continued to exist, then the technologies such as sending satellites to the space would not be possible today.

To sum up, there might be some cases harmful for humanity that need to restricted. However, the restrictions should not be expanded since they would generate economic value for governments in the long term. Furthermore, the attempts to restrict the researches to not to insult the religious feelings of the people is not logical because religious authorities might use these restrictions to pursue their rein. As a result, there should be only few restrictions on science.