Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Scandals can attain resurrection in fraction of time, sometime it reveals truth that no body expected and ever anticipated in their lives. People would not notice the person which were reliable and trustworthy there were swindling money behind their back, they would not come to notice untill scandal happened. That time people came to know about bitter truth. So I support this statement and I will justify this statement by taking three examples into consideration which will explicitly claim my reasoning for my propensity towards favor of statement.
Scandals reveal shocking truth that no one ever expected. For instance, take example of IPL in india. IPL is agency which organizes match between cricket teams. Wealthy person can buy or select one team and it plays under their name in IPL. So many actors as well as actress bought different teams and they played for them in IPL. But recent results that broached by CBI(crime branch of india) of india were shocking as well as horrific. They broached that many actresses were involved in scandal because they played batting and fixing on teams, which had a deep impact on afficionado of that particular actress. They were shocked that their favorite actress was involved in Scandals and CBI even proved those claims in court. These Scandals showed a real picture which was murkier before Scandals. It gave clear picture of actresses what they did. Before Scandals, they tried to show that they were against all these Scandals that were ongoing in IPL. But real truth was different. I was fan of one of those actresses because of all paved truths that they said in public but they were nothing more than conceit.
What Scandals can do others can not do. For instance, take case of politicians in India. Recently catastrophic that happened in one state of India revealed horrific truth. This state was pilgrim and annually people in thousands come to see these God temples. More than 4000 people died in this catastrophic. Which had a deep effect on public. In aftermath of investigation, police found that this catastrophic happened because of politicians. weather forecaster declared about advent of catastrophic in past then they gave this information to political leaders. And those leaders gave it to higher priority and finally government gave a fund for activities that can stop that catastrophic by building structure which can provide bulwark from glaciers but police told that all money that government funded was digested by people in politics. They did not take it seriously and finally they made a blunder mistake which took lives of people. Police still are finding dead bodies of people and they announced till now 4000 people are dead and they are searching for more. People were shocked when they came to know about that state's chief minister was also involved in that scandal.
These two examples shows that truth revealed which was horrific as well as shocking. People who never anticipated that celebrities whom they were fan of, was nothing more than conceit . Political leader who gave bombastic speech for favor of public can do gaffe which will take a shape of catastrophic and can take lives of more than 4000 people. These true scandals shows that Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2013-11-11 | pookieeee | 95 | view |
2013-09-25 | wasainika17 | 58 | view |
2013-09-12 | harpinder | 48 | view |
2013-07-01 | sylar | 77 | view |
2013-06-30 | tTONY FRANKIE | 46 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 75
- Science is meaningless without religion. 72
- The regional brand manager sent the following memo to the national brand manager for Sun-Beem Facial Cleanser.“We need to institute a huge publicity campaign for the launch of Sun-Beem’s improved formula. Without an enormous media blitz, including televis 70
- The following is a recommendation from the Board of Directors of Monarch Books."We recommend that Monarch Books open a café in its store. Monarch, having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years, has a large customer base because i 75
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you 85
Sentence: People would not notice the person which were reliable and trustworthy there were swindling money behind their back, they would not come to notice untill scandal happened.
Description: The fragment the person which is not usually followed by were
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace were with was
Sentence: These two examples shows that truth revealed which was horrific as well as shocking.
Description: The fragment examples shows that is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace shows with verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Sentence: These true scandals shows that Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Description: The fragment scandals shows that is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace shows with verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
flaws:
No. of Words: 556 350
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.259 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.386 0.50
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 32 15
No. of Words: 556 350
No. of Characters: 2739 1500
No. of Different Words: 256 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.856 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.926 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.41 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 190 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 138 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 93 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 45 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.375 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.957 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.406 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.259 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.386 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.057 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5