"Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams' revenue last year was twice as high as that of Fitch and included home sales that averaged $168,000, compared to Fitch's $144,000. Homes listed with Adams sell faster as well: ten years ago I listed my home with Fitch, and it took more than four months to sell; last year, when I sold another home, I listed it with Adams, and it took only one month. Thus, if you want to sell your home quickly and at a good price, you should use Adams Realty."
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
Writer suggesting his friends they should prefer Adams realty while dealing with their properties. He is comparing between two real estate agencies and explaining how one is superior than other based on some assumptions. His friends will decide by deep conclusion assumptions.
First, Adam has 40 real estate agents while Fitch has 25 and many of them work only part-time. This would be the reason for the superiority of Adams real estate. If attendant are more customer satisfaction will more. And as in Fitch realty many of them working part time may be they are unable to provide customer satisfaction. For instance, if you need advice in real estate dealing you will take help from firm who is available. And may be Adam's employees are more available than Fitch.
Second, as Adam's realty has more employees working in their firm they can engage to more home sales than Fitch. In result of this as writer mention Adam's revenue was higher than Fitch revenue.
Writer assume here about his own experience that ten years ago Fitch realty took four months to sold his home while last year Adams sold his home only in one month. Writer is comparing between two firms but he is not looking at time span. There would be many possibilities
Ten years ago may be property rate was higher so people willingness was not so much high as compare to last year. For example in recession property prices are less, so people have keen interest in property dealing. Property price is also depends in location of property. Location of last property may be not feasible compare to last year property.
In conclusion there can be many reasons like strength of employees between two firms, area of the property, economic situation. These reasons are responsible for the growth of Adams and Fitch realty.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2013-12-27 | souparnika | 67 | view |
2013-12-15 | aschocolate | 60 | view |
2013-12-07 | alimashreghi87 | 93 | view |
2013-10-31 | pookieeee | 85 | view |
2013-10-11 | smartaquarius10 | 74 | view |
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 50
- "Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the num 35
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition 60
- "Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams' revenue last year was twice a 30
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the extent 30
Sentence: For instance, If you need advice in real estate dealing you will take help from firm who are available.
Description: The fragment from firm who is not usually followed by are
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace are with is
Sentence: Ten years ago may be property rate was higher so people willingness was not so much high as compare to last year.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to people and willingness
Description: A conjunction, subordinating is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to as and compare
Sentence: For example in recession property rates goes down so people can buy property at low rate and vice versa can also happen.
Description: The fragment rates goes down is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace goes with verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Sentence: Many previous property not centrally localized compare to last year.
Description: A verb, past participle is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to localized and compare
Sentence: In conclusion there can be many reason may number of employees between two firms or area of the property or on which economic situation property has sold.
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to may and number
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 315 350
No. of Characters: 1486 1500
No. of Different Words: 165 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.213 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.717 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.327 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 98 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 62 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 43 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 27 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.75 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.677 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.65 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.308 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.583 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.142 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5