1、As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Some people doubt the function of technology that it brings people benefits to improve people's productivity, and claims that persons who increasingly resolve difficulties with technology will suffer deteriorated competence of independent thinking. Clearly, I acknowledge the possibility making people degrading could be a result after overly usage of technology, but I suggest we should see the intrinsic logic within the application of technology, that, whether people use it as a replacement for low-level things or as an more effective process leading to a higher level of resolution of advanced problems.
People who try to save their time by using technology may indeed get their independent thinking ability deteriorated. Amount of people waste the majority of their time searching and proofreading information. So they start to rely on websites containing enormous information from disparate sources, these websites typically are serving for whose need is testing and studying abroad, for complex procedures before preparing them. While the convenience of internet helps people to retain these collected information, there is no guarantee regarding the accuracy of them. Only because of these websites' magnitude of data, it is time-consuming to refresh those statistics on time, causing ambiguity that will influence needers' plan. However, people seem to lose ability and patience to figure out these amusements, which could be a pushover if they were directly looked at the first-hand source. Hence, in this context, technology does impair humans' thinking ability.
Though, does everyone using technology to attain no alternative goals other than spare time? In the community of literary, standing on the giant is not only a moonshine, but a suggestion to every tyro stepping into such field, or even, a requirement. And such claim is not just limited into the research papers that scholars had publicized previously, the come-to-date laboratory facilities with high tech are also significant, because these devices could help scholars to get results of experiments as soon as possible. For example, a researcher in management world harness statistical software and computer science to calculate data that are complicated to calculate personally, and only after the calculation, these researchers can conclude by comparing the result with precedent hypothesis.
Surprisingly, technology sometimes gives people opportunities to become versatile and well-rounded, because it can assign a task used to be finished by multiple people to merely one staff now. To illustrate, file typing, which was a work needing a specialist at typing alone, for the laded speed and the limitation of environment, which is a long distance between the start and destination of file transmission. But at present, these conundrums are all gone, and can be finished by just one person now called clerical staff. The staff completes his job with typing the file and sending it to the up and down, and even some operating businesses, considering more job contents like aesthetics and attraction extent. Can we say the technology is actually eroding our independence thinking in such context?
To sum up, whether technology brings bad to people is a wider question which cannot be easily answered given the volatile circumstances. That is why we need to discuss it in different perspectives. And the intrinsic logic, an ultimately goal of the use of technology, is a key to assess if technologies are salubrious.
- The following appeared as a recommendation by a committee planning a ten year budget for the city of Calatrava The birthrate in our city is declining in fact last year s birthrate was only one half that of five years ago Thus the number of students enroll 72
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 50
- The following appeared in a memo to the board ofdirectors ofBargain Brand Cereals One year ago we introduced our first productBargain Brand breakfast cereal Our very low prices quickly drew many customers away from the top selling cereal companies Althoug 77
- Many people believe that it is very important to make large amount of money while others are satisfied to earn a comfortable living Analyze each point and take a stand Give specific reasons for your position 3
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 522, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... replacement for low-level things or as an more effective process leading to a hig...
^^
Line 3, column 591, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'websites'' or 'website's'?
Suggestion: websites'; website's
...accuracy of them. Only because of these websites magnitude of data, it is time-consuming...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 224, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('ultimately') instead an adjective, or a noun ('goal') instead of another adjective.
... perspectives. And the intrinsic logic, an ultimately goal of the use of technology, is a key to a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, hence, however, if, look, may, regarding, so, well, while, even so, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2970.0 2235.4752809 133% => OK
No of words: 541.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4898336414 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82280071112 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11630739282 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 318.0 215.323595506 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587800369686 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 954.0 704.065955056 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.77640449438 563% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.5521174354 60.3974514979 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.428571429 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7619047619 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61904761905 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220409458028 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562730660608 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481401001097 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110448263496 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635055892728 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 48.8420337079 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.38706741573 121% => OK
difficult_words: 181.0 100.480337079 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.5 11.8971910112 181% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.