Many people believe that a beginner is more likely to make important contributions in any field of inquiry than an expert. However, based on my observation of life and personal experience, I partly agree with the statement; I think only when the beginners have some specific professions will they make an impact.
For starters, when it comes to vital contributions in a certain field of inquiry, the theses are mostly intricate and more advanced so that only the experts are able to think of and address those queries. For example, a sophisticated smartphone product manager can easily sense if there is a new trend of new technology in phones and do more research and analysis about the technology, then apply the best way into the annual plans. However, newcomers just start their skill from scratch, and it is difficult for them to memorize the routines of works, not to mention finding the trend in the next generation of smartphones and raising the concerns of current obstacles in the smartphone market.
Moreover, though beginners are still able to provide their concerns and suggestions, they are unable to make a great contribution. To elaborate more, a beginner dares to ask more questions and challenge the theory than an expert because they are exploring a new field. However, the concerns they raised might be solved by others before. In addition, it is assumed that beginners are more creative and innovative because they do not limit themselves. Nevertheless, even if they find out an interesting or important issue, they still need help from experts. Therefore, we cannot determine if the beginner is more likely to make a dedication than seniors.
Admittedly, in some conditions, beginners also play an essential role to lead corporations to move forward. If a new member is an expert in other fields, one can raise questions in his deft field and see things in different angles. For instance, a new soft engineer with web designer background can always provide queries about design thinking to engineering. Thus they can yield more interesting ideas in setting up functions for programming.
To sum it up, a beginner will definitely find it hard to make a dedication in any field of inquiry; nonetheless, those who are new yet adept in other fields still can bring the impact in any field.
- TPO-32 - Integrated Writing Task Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Alantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews 85
- TPO33-When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 66
- Integrated Writing TPO32 80
- 27. In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you tak 54
- tpo28 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 361, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...s about design thinking to engineering. Thus they can yield more interesting ideas i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, still, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, i think, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1936.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 386.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01554404145 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84560698744 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551813471503 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9432572246 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 5.21951772744 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195294639864 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071501610288 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608851012705 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12088017737 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489728440999 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.