79. Claim: The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing view point.
Reason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea.
At the first place, by defending an idea against contrasting views, one can interpret this idea to make it logically as complete and perfect as possible. Interpreted in such a complete way, the value of ideas would be quickly shown. For the people who have to defend their ideas, they should firstly know what the advantages as well as disadvantages of his ideas. To convince others, these disadvantages should be explained in a well-prepared way, so that they are not likely to be used by opponents. By thinking like possible opponents, people will have stronger ability to solve problems in different ways, which may lead them to discover the value of certain idea thoroughly.
However, the reasons of the statement is incorrect to some extent. If there is no opponents interested in opposing this idea, will it is not possible for supporters to find the value the the idea? The answer should be yes. Defending an idea is not the only way for supporters to find the value of the ideas. At the very beginning, when people begin to support certain ideas, they have found the value of these ideas. For those opponents, once they are convinced, they acceed the value of the idea by being convinced by others rahter than convincing others. Thus, the reason is unjustifiable because defending the idea is not the only way to find the value of the idea.
Even assume the reason is reasonable, the claim is imperfect to some degree. To convince the opposing points, the idea may be interpreted by different people in different way. Hence its ability to convince others varies with different supporters and it is also unrealistic to measure the defending ability of certain idea. For some people, who have already discovered the true value of the idea by defending, they possibly cannot convince others, however, an incomplete interpretation does not represent this idea is incomplete.
In conclusion, although defending an idea can motivate people to discover its value, it is not the only way to prove this idea.
- 158. The following appeared in a memo from the marketing director of Top Dog Pet Stores."Five years ago, Fish Emporium started advertising in the magazine Exotic Pets Monthly. Their stores saw sales increase by 15 percent. The three Fish Emporium stores i 72
- 49. Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose view contradict our own.Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning. 70
- 23. Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development. 85
- 38 The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian, a company that manufactures men's clothing."Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulties in obtaining reliable supplies of high quality wool fabric, we discontinued produc 80
- 20 The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the c 70
will it is not possible for supporters to find the value the the idea?
will it be not possible for supporters to find the value the the idea?
Sentence: If there is no opponents interested in opposing this idea, will it is not possible for supporters to find the value the the idea?
Description: The token the is not usually followed by an article
Suggestion: Refer to the and the
Sentence: For those opponents, once they are convinced, they acceed the value of the idea by being convinced by others rahter than convincing others.
Error: rahter Suggestion: rather
Error: acceed Suggestion: No alternate word
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 340 350
No. of Characters: 1625 1500
No. of Different Words: 149 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.294 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.779 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.666 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 108 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 81 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 64 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 45 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.417 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.647 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.383 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.534 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.108 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5