An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition.
In this statement, author is discussing about how to choose particular doctor for particular diseases. Author is stating that patient should have easy access to doctor's record of treating with similarly affected patients. Due to this patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition. I agree to the author for this statement.
A choosing of specialist doctor is wish of every patient. Every patient have wish in his/her mind that life of his/her is given in qualified and expert doctor of kind of diseases. In most cases, patient will ask to his friends/family/neighbor that which doctor is best suited for particular diseases? For this reason, author is trying to convince that ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor's record of treating similarly afflicted patients.
Author is right because, this will ensures doctor's experience about diseases which patient is having. For a case consider that there is one doctor which is mainly specialist of heart related diseases. But if suppose doctor is very much greedy and he/she start to give medicine to fever or cold, then it will be very bad situation for patient.
From above case, mostly everyone will agree about having access to doctor's record of treating similarly afflicted patients. I think, there should be one portal, operated by government. In this portal, information about every certified doctors should be listed. This information may contain specialization, degree, experience for particular diseases, area in which he/she accessible, patient's reviews, attitude of solving diseases, relation with patient, etc. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether doctor is competent to treat that medical condition.
Above process will really helpful for determining best doctor for particular diseases. There might be problem for newly joined doctor that some patient will not choose that doctor due to his/her lack of experience, but surely doctor will be able to treat that medical condition because he is certified for that diseases.
At the end, i can conclude that it is nice idea to gaining access of doctor's record of treating similarly afflicted patients for determining whether doctor is competent or not?
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-20 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
2019-12-02 | Harshali_15 | 50 | view |
2019-11-30 | Masterji | 66 | view |
2019-11-26 | sarahaduwa | 66 | view |
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.Write a response in which you discu 50
- "The following appeared as part of a petition sent to residents of Youngtown by an environmental protection group:"The Smith Corporation shouldn't be permitted to develop the land that is now part of the Youngtown Wildlife Preserve. This sanctuary is esse 50
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 16
- An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gree to the author for this statement. A choosing of specialist doctor is wish ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...treating similarly afflicted patients. Author is right because, this will ensur...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 44, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'ensure'
Suggestion: ensure
... Author is right because, this will ensures doctors experience about diseases which...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'starts'.
Suggestion: starts
...e doctor is very much greedy and he/she start to give medicine to fever or cold, then...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill be very bad situation for patient. From above case, mostly everyone will ag...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etent to treat that medical condition. Above process will really helpful for de...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 47, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'determining the best'.
Suggestion: determining the best
... Above process will really helpful for determining best doctor for particular diseases. There m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...use he is certified for that diseases. At the end, i can conclude that it is ni...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 21, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...for that diseases. At the end, i can conclude that it is nice idea to ga...
^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'may', 'really', 'similarly', 'so', 'then', 'i think', 'kind of', 'in most cases']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.260101010101 0.240241500013 108% => OK
Verbs: 0.186868686869 0.157235817809 119% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0782828282828 0.0880659088768 89% => OK
Adverbs: 0.040404040404 0.0497285424764 81% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0227272727273 0.0444667217837 51% => OK
Prepositions: 0.138888888889 0.12292977631 113% => OK
Participles: 0.0681818181818 0.0406280797675 168% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.75219481943 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0378787878788 0.030933414821 122% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0530303030303 0.0997080785238 53% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.040404040404 0.0249443105267 162% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0126262626263 0.0148568991511 85% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2308.0 2732.02544248 84% => OK
No of words: 358.0 452.878318584 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.4469273743 6.0361032391 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.58838876751 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.463687150838 0.366273622748 127% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.324022346369 0.280924506359 115% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.203910614525 0.200843997647 102% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.142458100559 0.132149295362 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75219481943 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 219.290929204 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.441340782123 0.48968727796 90% => OK
Word variations: 45.1543274708 55.4138127331 81% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6194690265 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.8421052632 23.380412469 81% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3055723411 59.4972553346 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.473684211 141.124799967 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8421052632 23.380412469 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.526315789474 0.674092028746 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.21349557522 173% => OK
Readability: 51.2443399 51.4728631049 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.86868686869 1.64882698954 113% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.555680117252 0.391690518653 142% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.136835681196 0.123202303941 111% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0963389750722 0.077325440228 125% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.573474407644 0.547984918172 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.165623152139 0.149214159877 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.224087626994 0.161403998019 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.187027232008 0.0892212321368 210% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.321260470237 0.385218514788 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0766665480319 0.0692045440612 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.353795017459 0.275328986314 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1101756699 0.0653680567796 169% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.30420353982 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.66592920354 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 13.5995575221 66% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.