An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Too often we rely on the doctor's treatment of other patients with similar disease to guess whether the doctor could treat the disease right in the past, so that he could do it even now. It often happens that the we are recommended a certain doctor by our kin. The assertion states that an ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor's record of treating similarly afflicted patients which may help the patient to gauge the doctor's competancy to treat that medical condition. I partially agree with the above claim.
On being aware of the doctor's record of similarly afflicted patients we can analyze which doctor can provide us a better treatment. Consider ,You have got arthritis and friend of yours recently suffered from Arthritis. He narrated his experience which sound like bad one as he had to go from one doctor to another as his condition was not improving. It might have happened that some doctors were not able to provide him the correct treatment. Now, if you already know which doctor's treatment he found useful and which one was not effective you can avoid going to that doctors and go to the ones who are better. Hence you can get a better treatment and recover soon.
However, you cannot be certain always that the treatment that worked for some patient may work for you too. It might happen that by analyzing some past records of a doctor related to a certain disease whose treatment you are searching for, you found a doctor whose treatment was effective for large number of patients. Consider, for example, you are suffering from a disease named 'Gangrene', Now there are several reasons for the disease. One of which is diabetes and other is some infection. Now, your friend had Gangrene caused due to some infection and he found a certain doctor's treatment useful. But if you are searching for a doctor who deals with Gangrene caused by diabetes you may not find the same doctor helpful in treating your case. But since it helped your friend you are inclined towards consulting the same doctor. The same treatment may not work out for you. Hence, knowing previous records of a doctor didn't benefit you here.
Therefore, we can say that knowing a doctor's record of treating similarly afflicted patients may benefit you in some cases while not in the others. It might also lead at times to delayed recovery from disease by getting into an incorrect treatment. Or it may also lead to stopping the growth of a certain disease due to proper treatment at early stage itself. Hence, we can conclude that knowing records of a doctor's treatment of a similar disease may at times help to know the competancy of a doctor to treat that medical condition provided the patient has a similar medical history as yours or the causes of disease are similar.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | Harshali_15 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | Masterji | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | sarahaduwa | 66 | view |
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than i 50
- Environmental protection policies should not be applicable to corporations, which generate significant financial and economical growth, even if such growth may have a negative impact on the environment. 50
- Claim Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system Reason Laws cannot change what is in people s hearts or minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason 80
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.Write a response in which you discu 50
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.Write a response in which you discu 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'doctors'' or 'doctor's'?
Suggestion: doctors'; doctor's
Too often we rely on the doctors treatment of other patients with simila...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'we'?
Suggestion: the; we
...d do it even now. It often happens that the we are recommended a certain doctor by our...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... provide us a better treatment. Consider ,You have got arthritis and friend of you...
^^
Line 5, column 612, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...tors and go to the ones who are better. Hence you can get a better treatment and reco...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 920, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...e, knowing previous records of a doctor didnt benefit you here. Therefore, we ca...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 410, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'doctors'' or 'doctor's'?
Suggestion: doctors'; doctor's
... can conclude that knowing records of a doctors treatment of a similar disease may at t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, similarly, so, therefore, while, for example, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 33.0505617978 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2303.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 485.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74845360825 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39913542368 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.426804123711 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 716.4 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2385201405 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.130434783 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0869565217 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13043478261 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317453750052 0.243740707755 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102771265351 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14017633776 0.0758088955206 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242306264424 0.150359130593 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144524268512 0.0667264976115 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.