An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor's record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat the medical condition.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain the reason for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The issue states that an ailing patient should get access to his or her doctor's record of treating similarly afflicted patients so that the patient can determine whether the doctor is competent to treat the medical condition or not. I agree with this statement because patients have their lives depending on the doctor so they should get access to the doctor's record.
A doctor studies hard to become a doctor. But if he cannot treat patients properly and makes mistakes repeatedly then the lives of patients is at risk. If a doctor is genuinely good at his work and at treating patients then he should not have any problem in showing his records to the patients. However one or two mistakes by the doctor should not define the doctor's ability. It is also possible that the patient had no chance of survival. So along with giving the records, it should also give the statistics how much survival chance did the patient have.
When a person is ill, he wants to go to the best doctor he can so that he can get the best treatment and get better soon. Some illness are such that a person's life is in danger. In such cases, the patient desperately tries to get the best doctor available. If the records are available to the patient, the patient can judge the doctor from it. Also if the records are given to the patient, the patient would be more comfortable with the doctor and would not have a doubt in his mind. For example if a person has cancer his life depends on the doctor entirely. So he should have the right to the records of his doctor.
In some countries malpractices are going on and some people get a doctor's degree without passing the examinations by giving money. In such cases the people's lives is in danger. If the doctor's records are readily available for the patient, he would get to know that the doctor is not competent to treat him or her. Nobody would go to such doctors and this malpractice would eventually stop. One disadvantage of giving the doctor's records to the patients would be that new doctors would have a tough time to get established even if they were very good doctor as they would not have records.
An ailing patient should have access to his doctor's records of treating similarly afflicted patients so that the patient can determine if he would be comfortable with the doctor treating him or not.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | Harshali_15 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | Masterji | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | sarahaduwa | 66 | view |
- The best way to teach—whether as an educator, employer, or parent—is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your 55
- A recent survey of 250 adults between 30-45 showed an association between the number of hours adults spend online each day and self reporting of symptoms commonly associated with depression. The survey found that adults who spend 30 hours or more online e 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 66
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 54
- The following appeared as part of a petition sent to residents of Youngtown by an environmental protection group:“The Smith Corporation should not be permitted to develop the land that is now part of the Youngtown Wildlife Preserve. This sanctuary is es 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'doctors'' or 'doctor's'?
Suggestion: doctors'; doctor's
...kes by the doctor should not define the doctors ability. It is also possible that the p...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...tter soon. Some illness are such that a persons life is in danger. In such cases, the p...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...e patient can judge the doctor from it. Also if the records are given to the patient...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, similarly, so, then, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1929.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 419.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60381861575 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39689441606 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.389021479714 0.4932671777 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 593.1 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6466715753 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8571428571 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9523809524 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.477432478692 0.243740707755 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174498310814 0.0831039109588 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145182903974 0.0758088955206 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.361769109108 0.150359130593 241% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143663429059 0.0667264976115 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 48.8420337079 141% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 12.1743820225 68% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 12.1639044944 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.99 8.38706741573 83% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.