All the students of a nation should study the same curriculum.
Some of the people suggest that all the students of a particular nation should study the same standard curriculum until they enter college. If the schools were to teach the same standard syllabus throughout the nation, ideally there would be just one kind of public school across the country operated by the educational unit of the government. This is indeed an issue that can be advantageous as well as carry disadvantages in various aspects.
Teaching of the same standard syllabus to all the students will ensure a similar educational level to all. Though it accords with the right to equality to education of any democratic country but violates the right to freedom of an individual student. If the same syllabus is being taught to all the students of a nation, there will be an equal opportunity available to everyone, irrespective of the fact they are rich or poor, residing in a small town or a big metropolitan city. Parallely, this will affect the various private and public schools being operated in the various parts of the nation.
Introduction of the same syllabus for all the students of the nation in every school would take away the freedom of students to choose which school to opt for as there would be no difference between any of them. Every school has some peculiarity based on academic syllabus or extra-curriculars which present a criteria for students or their parents to choose from. The students are in a growing age during the school and should be exposed to the maximum number of opportunities to choose from and explore their area of interest. Restricting them to a curriculum decided by some authority having a particular mind-set would circumscribe their imagination and creativity and thus hamper the overall development of the individual.
Every student has his/her own strength and weaknesses. For instance, one student is interested in mathematics and the other one in history, each one would not be able to score well in the other subject if they are forced to study them. This would result in failure in a grade because of one subject they are not incline towards. This would inturn hinder their progress and prove to be of no use in the future even if the student manages to passes the subject somehow. The same thing applies to extra-curricular activities. A student interested in basketball would not prefer to play cricket if made mandatory and would do no good.
Therefore, in my opinion, it should not be compulsory to bring into force the same syllabus for all the students of the nation. They should be allowed to choose from a few options and made some options mandatory to study as they are still naive and need some direction to get started on with their lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-14 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 50 | view |
| 2022-07-25 | Rajat_95 | 33 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Opak Pulu | 57 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | suraj1 | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | govinda1993 | 33 | view |
Comments
I will consider the
I will consider the suggestions and work on the faults.
Need your suggestions here…
Need your suggestions here on the page. Tell me what was your plan where you are going to see different best dissertation service suggestions which you can see the most when and where you can find such an attractive and impressive for these pages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
Some of the people suggest that all the students of...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 308, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a criterion' or simply 'criteria'?
Suggestion: a criterion; criteria
...abus or extra-curriculars which present a criteria for students or their parents to choose...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 441, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'pass'.
Suggestion: pass
...e future even if the student manages to passes the subject somehow. The same thing app...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'for instance', 'kind of', 'as well as', 'in my opinion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.217922606925 0.240241500013 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.144602851324 0.157235817809 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0875763747454 0.0880659088768 99% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0325865580448 0.0497285424764 66% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0346232179226 0.0444667217837 78% => OK
Prepositions: 0.130346232179 0.12292977631 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0325865580448 0.0406280797675 80% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.7724358518 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0488798370672 0.030933414821 158% => OK
Particles: 0.0020366598778 0.0016655270985 122% => OK
Determiners: 0.144602851324 0.0997080785238 145% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0346232179226 0.0249443105267 139% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0061099796334 0.0148568991511 41% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2716.0 2732.02544248 99% => OK
No of words: 463.0 452.878318584 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86609071274 6.0361032391 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.58838876751 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.347732181425 0.366273622748 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.269978401728 0.280924506359 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.172786177106 0.200843997647 86% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.097192224622 0.132149295362 74% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7724358518 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 219.290929204 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455723542117 0.48968727796 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 50.9436125697 55.4138127331 92% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6194690265 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.3684210526 23.380412469 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8728918398 59.4972553346 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.947368421 141.124799967 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3684210526 23.380412469 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.578947368421 0.674092028746 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 51.3662612254 51.4728631049 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.79807692308 1.64882698954 109% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.511609420309 0.391690518653 131% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.130297499436 0.123202303941 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0909673012948 0.077325440228 118% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.581252245944 0.547984918172 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.176464842996 0.149214159877 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.227573172724 0.161403998019 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.189676263083 0.0892212321368 213% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.459270469002 0.385218514788 119% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0968766760357 0.0692045440612 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.385919699977 0.275328986314 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141799321567 0.0653680567796 217% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.4325221239 125% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 7.22455752212 166% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.5995575221 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.