Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers
The statement inclines towards the ability of a leader to maintain the respect of his or her peers rather than a sound moral judgement. I believe a good moral judgement would improve the ability of the leader in preserving the respect of his or her followers makes a person a strong leader.
Let's assume a leader who has impeccable admiration from his or her peers but doesn't have a strong moral judgement. If there is a critical situation where he or she has to take a stance the leader's judgement quotient plays a major role because on wrong decision would also effect the strength of his or her relationship with the followers. This is not the mannerism expected of an effective leader.
Now in contradiction let's consider another leader who has a cogent moral judgement but is not much creditable. If there is a confounding moral situation and the leader is able to rectify the situation he or she would gain the respect for his actions and judgement.
Although the statement is true in some cases, I presume that a solid moral judgement is an important characteristic of an effective leader.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | arpit6798 | 79 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...rs makes a person a strong leader. Lets assume a leader who has impeccable admi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...le admiration from his or her peers but doesnt have a strong moral judgement. If there...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...here he or she has to take a stance the leaders judgement quotient plays a major role b...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[7]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...le because on wrong decision would also effect the strength of his or her relationship...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, as to, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 58.6224719101 27% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 2235.4752809 41% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 191.0 442.535393258 43% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8219895288 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 4.55969084622 82% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83013230403 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 215.323595506 45% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507853403141 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 704.065955056 41% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.2370786517 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9253628329 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.125 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.481355014777 0.243740707755 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.229886128814 0.0831039109588 277% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110404953072 0.0758088955206 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.30673322345 0.150359130593 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102761009469 0.0667264976115 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 100.480337079 39% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.