In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The issue of whether the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions is contentious one. While each side has its strengths and weaknesses, I agree with the statement for numerous reasons. Primarily, beginners are eager to learn new topics, and they can be directed in any way. In addition, they can be used to complete any task as they are not specialized in any area.
First of all, making important contributions in any field requires hard work and time which can be found in inexperienced people. Moreover, they can easily be shaped for new trends of world such as digital transformation, big data, machine learning etc. In contrast, most of the experts are specialized in an area, and it is almost impossible to make them adapt new topics. Ernst & Young, for example, an advisory company, hires only new graduates for its business, because it has long working hours and an orientation training simultaneously. Consequently, the firm increased its worth by $2 billion in five years by using this method.
Furthermore, beginners are able to do various tasks, despite lower salaries. On the other hand, even if the company pays lots of money, experts do not touch any work other than their job description. To illustrate, let us look at the example of Honeywell, an automation company. Honeywell restricted the expert hiring last year because of high salary expectations with limited work function, and it started to use beginners for multiple tasks like office and field operations. In this way, Honeywell gained the respect of participations and started to do business in other fields as it saved money rather than spending it on experts.
Admittedly, some may argue that experts are more likely than the beginners to make significant contributions. This is true especially when it comes to critical decisions about the company, foundation etc. Additionally, experts tend to do fewer mistakes than the beginners as they are more experienced at their field. However, the above argument does not constitute a sufficient support to claim that experts are always the decision makers or they do not do terrible mistakes. Joseph Dylan, for instance, IT director of Isbank, launched a new function for Isbank’s mobile application last month, but there was a bug which showed foreign currencies two times lesser than they are. When the company noticed the error, it has already lost $1.5 million. Hence, it is not a valid claim that as expertise of people greater, more they contribute.
In conclusion, although there might be greater affect of experts in any field, we cannot conclude that this affect is always in positive way. Even if the contribution is realized, it will probably be product of the beginners who spend hours to succeed it.
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. I 47
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 66
- This argument states that the Excelsior Company should conduct similar promotions that were done by Superior in introducing its own brand of coffee. While the author presents a merit in the claim, there are several questionable assumptions and evidence in 50
- The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves. 58
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rmation, big data, machine learning etc. In contrast, most of the experts are spe...
^^
Line 3, column 591, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...quently, the firm increased its worth by billion in five years by using this meth...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2324.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 456.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09649122807 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88208645662 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 721.8 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6067850374 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.043478261 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8260869565 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91304347826 5.21951772744 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219269759634 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630618955948 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593175820327 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122574188279 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386360348923 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.