In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Field of investigation is very important in our society and it is nearly connected with police, military. In this field, skill and experienced knowledge are necessary.Though novices do not have experienced and they are not adept, they have an unquenchable desire to explore everything which leads them to collect many information during inquiry. For this reason I corroborate with the author's thesis.
During the time of inquiry, adepts try to solve that with their pragmatically expertise, they correlate the new inquiry with their old ones. Because of this, they miss out some important figures which is very important to solve the investigation. As a beginner does not have enough knowledge or qualifications so, he investigates every little things very subtly. This discern quality make him able to find out essential clues which are very much important to solve a case. By this way,a novice can play an important role in inquiry than an expert.
In police or any investigation office or works, qualified persons are in high rank and the tyros are in the entry-level. In other words, They solve the cases. Once some of the thieves’ stolen enormous expensive things from my house, then my father go to the cops and ask them to inquiry about this. Throughout the period, cops investigate the complain and the cops are constituted of both beginner and skilled person. I have noticed that beginner had enlightened many topics which experts ignore. In addition to this, these information’s help them to catch the thieves. From this I have learned that a fledgling does an important contribution in any inquiry.
At the end, I want to summarize that both experts and fledgling are very important in inquiry but fledgling have more ability to reveal some hidden things which might be paramount in any inquiry. So, they play more important role than experts.
- Downtown Zurzi is becoming increasingly congested with traffic, increasing the commuting time for those who work downtown or near downtown. The nearby city of Loft was faced with the same problem several years ago and implemented a small weekly tax for dr 63
- The following is a recommendation from the personnel director to the president of Acme Publishing Company."Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed-Reading Course has greatly improved productivity. One 23
- Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws. 50
- "Last week, all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towers complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to one-third of what it used to be. Although actual readings of water usage before and after the adjustment are 43
- a nation should maintain a homogenous national curriculum for the study of the students untill they enter the college 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Though
...and experienced knowledge are necessary.Though novices do not have experienced and the...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 314, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
... everything which leads them to collect many information during inquiry. For this re...
^^^^
Line 1, column 314, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun information seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much information', 'a good deal of information'.
Suggestion: much information; a good deal of information
... everything which leads them to collect many information during inquiry. For this reason I corro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 386, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... For this reason I corroborate with the authors thesis. During the time of inquiry, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 402, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... I corroborate with the authors thesis. During the time of inquiry, adepts try t...
^^^
Line 2, column 485, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , a
...h important to solve a case. By this way,a novice can play an important role in in...
^^
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...other words, They solve the cases. Once some of the thieves' stolen enormous expensive...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...Throughout the period, cops investigate the complain and the cops are constituted of both be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, in addition, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 307.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09120521173 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91837772771 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543973941368 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.9718952154 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9411764706 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0588235294 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.70588235294 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177107228206 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621462455946 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041644330551 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122009609037 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285994444806 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.