In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It is said that there is nothing new under the sun. Thus, everything that can be discovered has already being discovered. The above position is extreme and would not be valid all the time. This is because both beginners or experts can make important contributions to their chosen fields by new innovations, propounding new conventions, or modifying accepted norms and patterns.
The underlying premise of the above is that a beginner would be more eager to make an impact than an expert. It assumes that the newness of subject to the beginner would encourage him to contribute more compared to the established expert who may become complacent. The argument is correct because holding other factors constant, a beginner who is yet to inculcate the accepted practices of a particular field may yield new discoveries thus improving the field compared to the expert who has seen it all and may want to maintain the existing state of affairs. However, experience also counts and for this reason an expert who is knowledgeable in that field may contribute more to its development.
It is possible that a beginner may contribute more than an expert becasue he would view the matter in new light and make obvious observations that experts may miss thus leading to new discoveries. On the otherhand, the expert with his experienced eye and knowledge is able to ascertain what works and what does not work. He should also able to identify quickly new ideas. Thus, either a beginner or expert might make important contributions it depends on each individual and the goals they hope to achieve in their chosen fields.
Examples of beginners who have offered new ideas that impact a field of study abound. For instance, Leornado Da Vinci made more contributions to the field of paintings than his master and other established painters of his time. In the field of medicine, a doctor was able to identify the causes of cholera in a district. Also, experts such as Ann Curie after years of study made important contributions to the field of medicine.
Both beginners and experts contribute immensely to their chosen fields. Usually, the beginner is able to build on or modify existing contributions. For example Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle made important contributions to government and philosophy. Aristotle was able to build on the works Socrates and Plato.
In conclusion, either experts or beginners can make important contributions to their fields. Success is dependent on the individual.
- A recently issued twenty-year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates. Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin, a medicine used to treat headaches. 50
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. I 50
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things. 50
- People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it. 50
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2088.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 409.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10513447433 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90590268578 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457212713936 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 649.8 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.506145047 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9090909091 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5909090909 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171577569823 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561276668278 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387880469421 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100764623487 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203187326863 0.0667264976115 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.