Stating that those in power should step down after five years, many would say that an organization can make a meaningful progress with introducing new leadership in a regular basis. In some sense, it is difficult to deny that success of an organization depends on its revitalization through younger, innovative spirits. From my respective, however, this concept ignores that there are also several side-effects from continuous changes in leadership.
Of course, few would disagree that importing new bloods can play a vital role making success of an organization. When it comes to the rapid changes in social, economical, cultural conditions, it seems to be necessary for an enterprise to rely on different perspectives from old and antiquated ones. Understanding that a new generation of potential customers has exactly new kinds of tastes and platforms, Bill Gates wisely and bravely stepped down his position as CEO of Microsoft not because he lacked of energy or wisdom but because he recognized that the younger one could more relatively adapt to the new tastes. The example implies that true success of an organization comes from periodically changes in leadership.
Nevertheless, is a stable and consistent leadership always detrimental to the growth of an organization? My answer is definitely no. With respect to building of long-standing identity or tradition in businesses, frequent changes in leadership may work against. Fortunately, Apple could survive at the brink bankruptcy and in fact, take a tremendous success by relying on an old leadership of Steve Jobs who once again threw clumsy and banal attempts using his own version of innovation. This shows that staying an old leadership can be also an effective way to get success of an enterprise.
Further, the limitation of replacing leadership in an organization from old ones can be found in terms of the lack of experience in business world. In fact, it is not difficult to observe that many younger ones cannot avoid wasting time to make an appropriate improvement because of their poor experience, while old ones with diverse experience are able to make a profit effectively. Without business experience in reality, many new introduced leaders in an enterprise cannot easily consider several affecting factors on their businesses. Further, new importing would not understand and recognize about their workers’ abilities and inclinations, which are necessary things to make a meaningful success of an enterprise. In this regard, regularly changes in leadership are not only advantageous but also counterproductive.
To sum, despite of the merit of giving a change to younger ones to become leaders in an organization, both advantages of old ones in an organization with long-standing characters in business and valuable experience of old ones tell us that frequently replacing in leadership is not always helpful. Thus I cannot fully agree with the concept that periodically changes in leadership.
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 86
- TPO-17 - Integrated Writing Task In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States,birds in particular. Unfortunately for b 86
- TPO-29 - Integrated Writing Task Large numbers of dinosaur fossils have been discovered in deposits on Alaska's North Slope, a region that today experiences an extremely cold,arctic climate. One hundred million years ago, when those dinosaurs were alive, 86
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 66
- integrated task: salvage logging benefits 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'meaningful progress'.
Suggestion: meaningful progress
...would say that an organization can make a meaningful progress with introducing new leadership in a re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 299, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ng in leadership is not always helpful. Thus I cannot fully agree with the concept t...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'in fact', 'of course', 'with respect to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.238372093023 0.240241500013 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.122093023256 0.157235817809 78% => OK
Adjectives: 0.122093023256 0.0880659088768 139% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0600775193798 0.0497285424764 121% => OK
Pronouns: 0.031007751938 0.0444667217837 70% => OK
Prepositions: 0.156976744186 0.12292977631 128% => OK
Participles: 0.031007751938 0.0406280797675 76% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.21794800854 2.79330140395 115% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0290697674419 0.030933414821 94% => OK
Particles: 0.00193798449612 0.0016655270985 116% => OK
Determiners: 0.0852713178295 0.0997080785238 86% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0271317829457 0.0249443105267 109% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00968992248062 0.0148568991511 65% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2986.0 2732.02544248 109% => OK
No of words: 468.0 452.878318584 103% => OK
Chars per words: 6.38034188034 6.0361032391 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.58838876751 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.399572649573 0.366273622748 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.34188034188 0.280924506359 122% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.237179487179 0.200843997647 118% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.192307692308 0.132149295362 146% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21794800854 2.79330140395 115% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 219.290929204 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521367521368 0.48968727796 106% => OK
Word variations: 61.0660418793 55.4138127331 110% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6194690265 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.6315789474 23.380412469 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.1139696255 59.4972553346 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.157894737 141.124799967 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6315789474 23.380412469 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.631578947368 0.674092028746 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 58.8196131354 51.4728631049 114% => OK
Elegance: 2.0 1.64882698954 121% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269289270308 0.391690518653 69% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0904329842144 0.123202303941 73% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0580304786098 0.077325440228 75% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.520979667602 0.547984918172 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.152229706472 0.149214159877 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114091395036 0.161403998019 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544302808497 0.0892212321368 61% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.409974219543 0.385218514788 106% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0838501328243 0.0692045440612 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192940555541 0.275328986314 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448655691327 0.0653680567796 69% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.4325221239 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.