In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
In the given statement, author depicts that if we want to achieve something or we want to be a successful person we should always discuss with all those people who have contrasting point of view from us because in this whole world there are lots of people exist and we all have different capability to think on any point of view. So, it may possible that we have an idea on such topic that others have something else. So, if we communicate with others our idea may be conflicted but through that we can learn something innovative and this will help us a lot and one day this will be converted into our success for sure.
As we have seen above that all the people have different point of view on particular thing and no one will think equal so sometimes it may possible that if we want to do something and for that whatever idea we have that they may be clashed with others’ point of view. At that time, we should not ignore them because there must be something hidden thing that we can be missed. So, we always try to communicate with all those people who have contrasting points of view.
If we communicate with all the people as much as we can then this will definitely help us a lot in our thinking capability and through that we can be an adorable thinker. For getting success, we should improvise our thinking capability and it always comes first and for that we should be a versatile and flexible with others point of view instead of being stubborn. We should never ever neglect others point of view because as we have seen above there always can be one hidden thing behind the curtain that we are not be able to see and this thing we can gather by communication with others only.
In the conclusion, as we have seen above that for getting success we should always try to discuss with all those people who have contrasting point of view because discussion is the only thing through that speaker and listener both can gather so much different things and through that we can be able to be an adorable thinker and as we have seen above that for getting success in any field first we should improvise our thinking capability and this only can be possible through the discussion with all those people who have contrasting point of view.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-29 | Seonghun | 83 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | cnegus | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-20 | jessie_llj | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | melavdev | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | jdpatel1107 | 50 | view |
- Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall stu 77
- In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 519, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...hing behind the curtain that we are not be able to see and this thing we can gathe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 33.0505617978 203% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1850.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 411.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50121654501 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39002768714 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 215.323595506 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.333333333333 0.4932671777 68% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 574.2 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 23.0359550562 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 131.70876964 60.3974514979 218% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 185.0 118.986275619 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.1 23.4991977007 175% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.21951772744 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205944842743 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126604771619 0.0831039109588 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114972584002 0.0758088955206 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183713267971 0.150359130593 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074780231237 0.0667264976115 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.3 14.1392134831 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 12.1743820225 139% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.71 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 100.480337079 38% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 11.2143820225 164% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.7820224719 153% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.