To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
Leaders of many generations have been steadfast with their decisions and principles to be triumph. Such leaders have made revolutionary and changed the way of thinking to amend a conundrum.
To begin with, many companies are appointing mature and stable employees for upper management. Indeed, there are protocols which must be followed by every leader to carry out his tasks effectively. Compromising and ignoring ethical principles can relegate his status in the company. For example, many CEO’s have been ostracized from the company because of their lack of chivalry attitude. This could demotivate the employees of the company. Such impute towards any person should be punished with stringent actions. In addition, company’s name is deteriorated and investment from other companies could be circumscribed.
Secondly, moral standard to even lead a country is more important in this generation. For example, Barack Obama who had lucid intentions to develop the economy of the country. There was no doubt about his credibility. His passion to serve others was conspicuous and irrefutable. Moreover, there was a consummate revenge against the person who desiccated the Twin Towers. Such brave and haughty nature of president is still recognised and appreciated. His principle and ethics to serve the country has been remarkable.
However, there are situations, where finagle plays important role in one’s life. To bolster this statement let us take an example two country’s leaders. There are times when one country has to remain sangfroid for the development of one’s country. If there are leaders like Hitler who was firm with his principle’s and moral’s for a particular religion. Following his commands have led us destruction of many lives. Such situations can be avoided if one compromises with another to make peace.
In conclusion, there are times when impertinence should be eschewed. Moral principles and ethics should be their primacy. Disobeying them can lead to ambiguous and nowhere.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-21 | Zahid6400 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-06 | anupad1 | 50 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | swlee98 | 66 | view |
| 2022-11-10 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people Recently however archaeol 40
- According to a recent report by our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actual 66
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education 50
- To be an effective leader a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards 50
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...us and irrefutable. Moreover, there was a consummate revenge against the person who desiccat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 312.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46794871795 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94974898363 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586538461538 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 23.0359550562 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.0215036209 60.3974514979 31% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.24 118.986275619 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.48 23.4991977007 53% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.92 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152263557196 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406334238854 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505861671308 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0898998171182 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278125100085 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 48.8420337079 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.2 12.1743820225 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.56 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 11.2143820225 61% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.7820224719 59% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.