The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The discovery of something new is often done by people who are passionate about their work. The prompt recommends that inventions happen by people passionate about their work. I strongly agree with this suggestion and argue that people look inwards rather than outwards to work in the field they are passionate about for two reasons.
To begin, inventions are often made by people who are passionate about their work rather than forced to do it. Thus the idea to invent something meaningful from work that a person loathes is highly unlikely. For example, in earlier times when inventions were hardly scratching the surface to gain everyone's eyes on it Madam Curie was the first woman to be awarded a Nobel prize in both physics and chemistry for her remarkable work in both fields.
After the invention of radioactivity for spontaneous radiation and winning a Nobel prize further winning one in chemistry for the invention of radium that is even now used to treat cancer. The above example shows that only those succeed who have a hunger for something in the field of work they like.
Further, even if we assume inventions happen only in some popular fields and not all fields one should still pursue his or her interest in the field because happiness plays a crucial role in our efficiency of work. For instance, if a person who is passionate about training horses and chose a future in some other booming field in which they lack interest or even abhor they will end up ruining themselves by not being productive and not being completely devoted to their work, research shows that efficiency is determined by how good they feel about their job.
Of course, some might argue that accidental inventions or great ideas have been a result of how bored someone was with their work so we should give in, but isn't this the reason why we should pursue what we have an interest in so that we could contribute better and knowingly rather than accidents. People who ignore their inner voices do that at their own peril and end up suffering rather than finding happiness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-10 | HAN YEBIN | 50 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | HAN YEBIN | 50 | view |
| 2024-06-07 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
| 2024-06-07 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
| 2024-05-19 | ascetichedonist | 66 | view |
- Analytical Writing Assessment Question The following memo appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces 53
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...their work rather than forced to do it. Thus the idea to invent something meaningful...
^^^^
Line 8, column 157, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...th their work so we should give in, but isnt this the reason why we should pursue wh...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, so, still, thus, for example, for instance, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 357.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80672268908 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44130141697 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526610644258 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.5079420707 60.3974514979 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.0 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.75 23.4991977007 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0765086314608 0.243740707755 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0330695727747 0.0831039109588 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0200343647024 0.0758088955206 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0469756020444 0.150359130593 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0102012061337 0.0667264976115 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.