If Sir Isaac Newton had neglected the apple falling from the tree as an everyday boring event I am not sure at what stage our physics would have been. A simple and universal thing like apple falling from a tree sparked an interest within him to ask the most fundamental question in physics "WHY". The question then led to a series of experiments and thought processes which gave us the modern day concept of gravity. Commonplace things when fused with a passionate mind can become genesis of wonderful ideas.
Humans are basically very inquisitive creatures when we are born. The passion and rigour is at its peak during childhood. And that's the reason we learn so fast at that stage. This passion when brought into our daily adult lives can create ripples of improvement in a monotonous routine. A simple observation like dogs like to sniff around can lead to an innovative idea of employing them as sniffer dogs at crime scenes. Similarly when we observe an everyday event that a sunflower always faces the sun from morning to evening can be used to create something like movable solar plates for maximum energy generation. Innovators don't need inspirations, they just have make use their passionate interest in things which they hear and see. Let's take the example of Uber which is afterall just a taxi network. The CEO faced the every day issue of taxi ride unavailability and instead of hopelessly cursing the system, thought something new. The passion with which he saw the chance of converting problem into an opportunity is what makes him an innovator.
All these examples show us that the simplest of things can bring out amazing ideas just with a paradigm shift and rigour. However, it is noteworthy that if I am person who is stuck in an endless rut of everyday life it becomes difficult for me to see things differently. We all need some anomaly in our lives to recharge. Even with endless passion I can't see things differently if I am not susceptible to new ideas and perspectives. For this reason, we need to step out of the comfort zone and explore not so common things. This can lead to quandary of changes in perspective and rekindle our passion.
In conclusion, I would say that I completely agree with the statement but with a small caveat that the statement is limited and is generalized. If need arises we need to step out of everyday routine to view the world with new tinted glasses. Once recharged, the passion can be used to light up the banal things of our life too. Someone great once said that "The passion is what keeps us young" is absolutely correct here.
- The first step to self knowledge is rejection of the familiar 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 50
- Claim An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action Reason When assessing the morality of an action the results of the action are more important than the inte 54
- I strongly disagree with the given statement Even though I agree that University experience is much more important than the univerity education however it should not undermine student s freedom to choose the location of study When a person is forced to st 16
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...ur is at its peak during childhood. And thats the reason we learn so fast at that sta...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 422, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...g them as sniffer dogs at crime scenes. Similarly when we observe an everyday event that ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 628, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...r maximum energy generation. Innovators dont need inspirations, they just have make ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 737, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...rest in things which they hear and see. Lets take the example of Uber which is after...
^^^^
Line 3, column 776, Rule ID: AFTERALL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'after all'?
Suggestion: after all
... Lets take the example of Uber which is afterall just a taxi network. The CEO faced the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 820, Rule ID: ANINFOR_EVERY_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'the everyday'?
Suggestion: the everyday
...rall just a taxi network. The CEO faced the every day issue of taxi ride unavailability and i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...o recharge. Even with endless passion I cant see things differently if I am not susc...
^^^^
Line 7, column 145, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tatement is limited and is generalized. If need arises we need to step out of ever...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, similarly, so, then, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2162.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 454.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76211453744 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66990155502 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54845814978 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 684.9 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8027000844 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.0833333333 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9166666667 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.16666666667 5.21951772744 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163482128442 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465902251066 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339844341748 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102535194422 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00552525042241 0.0667264976115 8% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.