The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people they lead. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In today’s world, the importance of having good leadership skills is unknown to only a few. Leaders are selected in order to coordinate activities in a company, lead a nation to success or make sure each team member is doing their part in a group project, and in all these settings, the leaders’ primary role is to serve the ones they are leading. Although some are of the opinion that it’s better for the inferior people not to interfere with a leader’s decisions, as far as I’m concerened, assuming a ruler decides whether to act on a suggestion or not, feedback should be encouraged from the people, as some suggestions might prove to be useful.
We are all human, and being human means being imperfect. The burden of having to make crucial decisions comes with every leadership position. Similar to a president’s decisions which are crucial for the country’s economical, industrial and academic success, the decisions of the head of a team project are crucial for the outcome of the project. Yet taking into account that these leaders are far from being omniscient, they are very much prone to occasional mistakes regardless of how good of a leader they are. Thus, taking into account feedback and suggestions could mitigate this matter, and make them realize their mistakes and compensate for them.
It is true that not all people are adept leaders, and not all people’s opinions are in favor of the team, the nation or the company, however as far as there’s a competent person, in this case the leader, considering the suggestions and deciding whether to act towards the will of the advisor, it is safe to say that encouraging feedback is more fruitful than discouraging it and leading a dictatorship. Humans often tend to oversee their own mistakes or undermine their good deeds, and feedback from others, which could be positive or negative, could cast light on their wrong doings or show them others’ appreciation for what they’ve done right. Therefore, I believe encouraging feedback to be cruicial for being a good leader who humbly serves the people.
To conclude, feedback and critism play an integral role in improving a leaders’ decisions when it comes to doing what’s best for the people, and considering the fact that the leaders themselves are the last filter through which these suggestions pass before becoming influential on the their decisions, it is safe to say that encouraging feedback from the people is one of the things that makes good leaders, enabling them to serve the people to the best of their abilities.
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people they lead Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supportin 50
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 50
- The following was presented as part of a business plan by Apex Corporation To answer the increased demand for artisanal coffee Apex Corporation is releasing a new line of coffee Gourmet Select Apex Corporation will first introduce the coffee into major su 74
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complain 78
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 53
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lected in order to coordinate activities in a company, lead a nation to success o...
^^
Line 2, column 95, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'decisions'' or 'decision's'?
Suggestion: decisions'; decision's
...t. The burden of having to make crucial decisions comes with every leadership position. S...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 551, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ich could be positive or negative, could cast light on their wrong doings or show...
^^
Line 4, column 284, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...ons pass before becoming influential on the their decisions, it is safe to say that encou...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, therefore, thus, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2143.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 430.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98372093023 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74888836375 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490697674419 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 23.0359550562 152% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 126.900442167 60.3974514979 210% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 178.583333333 118.986275619 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.8333333333 23.4991977007 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198085160082 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728836412751 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455522439957 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136157757271 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228067228617 0.0667264976115 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 14.1392134831 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 48.8420337079 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.8971910112 147% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 11.2143820225 143% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lected in order to coordinate activities in a company, lead a nation to success o...
^^
Line 2, column 95, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'decisions'' or 'decision's'?
Suggestion: decisions'; decision's
...t. The burden of having to make crucial decisions comes with every leadership position. S...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 551, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ich could be positive or negative, could cast light on their wrong doings or show...
^^
Line 4, column 284, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...ons pass before becoming influential on the their decisions, it is safe to say that encou...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, therefore, thus, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2143.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 430.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98372093023 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74888836375 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490697674419 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 23.0359550562 152% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 126.900442167 60.3974514979 210% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 178.583333333 118.986275619 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.8333333333 23.4991977007 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198085160082 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728836412751 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455522439957 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136157757271 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228067228617 0.0667264976115 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 14.1392134831 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 48.8420337079 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.8971910112 147% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 11.2143820225 143% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.