The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Just like the popular adage which says "United we stand, divided we fall", the topic of this issue revolves around this adage.
I mostly agree with the author's claim that the best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. However, there is a bit of a twist to this claim which will be addressed in the succeeding paragraphs.
To start with, to effectively lead it is important to collaborate and cooperate due to the fact that a tree does not make a forest. As a potential leader in different fields, it is important to be able to effectively work with various people across different races, backgrounds, and even age groups. Many a time, the best of achievement is always a result of collaboration between two or more willing individuals, and this is not any different in leadership. As a leader, the ability to tolerate and manage people effectively to get the best out of them is very important.
Furthermore, it has happened countlessly that the resources needed to drive a particular project can only be harnessed through cooperating with other individuals of like-mind. The need to aggregate people's strength to drive the success of a particular cause is only possible when the spirit of cooperation is promoted among the youth population. At the end of the day, they become better off and keep breaking boundaries with the power abound in cooperating to do things.
Although, cooperation is the best mantra, sometimes a healthy competition can help to wake up those youths falling into slumber. competition would help those who are not being productive wake-up, sit tight and do better since they know they can be outshined by a rival. Hence, the need to impress and do better than your counterpart can also build effective leadership skill in youths.
Hence, it is crystal clear that cooperation builds a better leadership skill than competition among youths.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | hainess25 | 70 | view |
| 2024-08-28 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-02 | MMoksha | 66 | view |
| 2024-06-30 | AkellaSrinivas | 66 | view |
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 50
- Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed Reading Course has greatly improved productivity One graduate of the course was able to read a 500 page report in only two hours another graduate rose from an a 53
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 130, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Competition
...e up those youths falling into slumber. competition would help those who are not being prod...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, still, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 335.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02089552239 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97182732166 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573134328358 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2459793332 60.3974514979 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 120.142857143 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9285714286 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213226928528 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691880067051 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100305774144 0.0758088955206 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109822555855 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117714182456 0.0667264976115 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.